feedback for "Bad Parent: Use Your Words — Please!"

  1. My 17-month-old is not talking yet either, and we didn't do sign language with her. I wouldn't worry too much that you caused a speech delay. I've read research that suggests that sign use does not delay spoken speech. I actually wish we had done sign language, because we're still in the whining and pointing frantically stage.

    posted by : paxi on 10/16/2008 at 9:53 AM Flag For Abuse

  2. Don't beat yourself up. It's hard to know what to do. In fifeteen years he really won't want to talk to you anyway:)
    I've also met a number of 16-18 month olds who are just not talking the parent all seem sheepish about it. But, yesterday there was a 14 month old at the swings who was repeating my evern last word. WoW! Sometimes I wonder how accurate the charts that we all follow any way are. They are a good guide but also seem to generate a lot of stress.
    If it makes you feel better my 14 month old does not walk or stand or show any interest in doing either.

    posted by : Birdieta on 10/16/2008 at 10:14 AM Flag For Abuse

  3. Elizabeth, don't worry. You only did what most experts recommend. As a new parent, you trust what you think will be best, and there's a lot of advice out there! A LOT! Too much!

    First of all, your son will talk! You were talking to him the whole time you were teaching him to sign, right? He was listening.

    I don't think sign language is necessarily harmful, but I consciously chose not to teach my now 2-year-old daughter any signs so far, though I will when she's a little older. My sister is deaf, so I learned sign language young (age 10). I had no shortage of babysitting jobs - there aren't too many available for deaf children. It was striking that in the families with a hearing child and a deaf one, the hearing one would pick up sign language and often refuse to talk because it was just easier. One little boy I took care of spoke perfectly if his deaf sister wasn't around, but when she was, he only signed and refused to speak. His parents didn't even know he could talk until they heard him alone in his room talking to action figures just before he turned two.

    posted by : edamommy on 10/16/2008 at 12:52 PM Flag For Abuse

  4. I think you should get some informed advice. Your pediatrician has it wrong - the terrible twos are not caused by a lack of speech ability, they are caused by your son being two. Two-year olds are well on the way to realizing that you do indeed take orders - it is your job as far as they are concerned.

    Encourage the signs, but don't patronize him - if he signs "more" & it's not apparent what he wants, then ask "more what?".

    Sign language is not supposed to be a replacement for talking. It is also not really supposed to be a second language. Baby signs are not American Sign Language & are not meant to be. They are meant to be a communication avenue for you son who is smart enough to understand lots of words & concepts, but does not have vocal/motor coordination to say them out loud.

    To get him to speak, usually all it takes is for you & your husband to speak to him - unrelentingly, about everything.

    Remember also, that he is just a toddler - he will not make small talk like a miniature Dick Cavett. To him, hearing a dog is a newsworthy event - he is learning about the world around him & they start small: dog, cat, truck, moon, stars...

    BTW, if your son signs "more food" give him more food...

    posted by : steiny on 10/16/2008 at 5:49 PM Flag For Abuse

  5. How can a master's student (and a pediatrician) not do any research?

    1. Signing, like any second language, can cause INITIAL delays but the child will usually catch up and surpass peers.

    2. Signing does not cause language problems requiring speech therapy. If your child has a learning disability, speech problem, or significant delays, he would have had them anyway and signing is an important part of helping him to communicate. There is no damage to undo.

    3. Many children are not speaking yet by your son's age. It never hurts to have an expert check things out, but you are not at panic stage, by any means.

    4. Having a highly verbal child does not prevent tantrums. I can attest to this 100%. Even a very verbal two year old will want things he or she cannot communicate or can communicate but should not have or just plain melt down for whatever reason.

    5. The benefits of teaching a few signs is early communication. You'd have to actually introduce it like a second language to get the big benefits of bilingualism.

    posted by : CaliMama on 10/16/2008 at 6:04 PM Flag For Abuse

  6. If it makes you feel any better, my older son didn't start saying much until he was almost two, and we hadn't been using signs (though at times I wished we had!)

    There's nothing wrong with consulting a speech therapist if you have concerns, and they might be able to get some words flowing, but I don't think you should blame yourself for what's probably normal for your son. Every kid is different.

    posted by : AllisonWonder on 10/16/2008 at 6:54 PM Flag For Abuse

  7. I've never thought of this aspect of signing..didn't do it with either of mine, but I can see where your train of thought is coming from. Maybe he just doesn't have as much motivation to speak vocally? I wouldn't worry about the developemental stuff though - if that were off he wouldn't be signing huh?


    http://heyyourememberme.blogspot.com

    posted by : that girl on 10/16/2008 at 6:57 PM Flag For Abuse

  8. We tought our son signing and he had no speech delay.

    IMHO I don't think you should worry that it's the signing that's delaying your son's speech.

    posted by : k1 on 10/16/2008 at 7:23 PM Flag For Abuse

  9. Whether or not your child's speech delay is caused by the signing I dont know. But I am SO glad to hear an article criticizing signing in any way. I have a 17 month old son who I CHOSE not to sign with. I have a degree in education and have worked as a preschool teacher and as a director of a well respected preschool program in which we did do baby sign. However, I chose not to sign with my son because not all signing research is positive. I cannot tell you how many times I was outright criticized for not signing with him! As if the only explanation for it was laziness! It was a choice that I am very confident in. Especially since my son is saying somewhere in the vicinity of 25 words (first word "Mama" at 7 1/2 months) plus the sound effects of 10 or so animals and objects (i.e. cars or airplanes). Not that he wouldnt be if I had signed -- I'll just never know for sure about that. But, like I said, I am SOOOO happy to see someone hop off of the baby sign bandwagon!

    posted by : Jacks Mama on 10/16/2008 at 10:36 PM Flag For Abuse

  10. It's highly unlikely that signing caused a speech delay in your son, unless you were only signing to him and not speaking at all! Do some research - there's plenty out there that shows that signing, in most cases, helps, rather than hinders, language development. (Here's one place to start: http://www.signingtime.com/resources/articles) Our daughter started signing at 7 months, and at 18 months, she knows dozen and dozens of signs. She also said her first word at 9 months and now knows literally hundreds of words. If anything, signing has been an excellent way to encourage her language skills - she would sign and say something at once, and it was much easier to understand her baby gibberish this way, so we would repeat the word she was trying to say back to her, which encouraged her to keep speaking - and yes, to keep signing, too!

    posted by : karmamama on 10/16/2008 at 10:57 PM Flag For Abuse

  11. I can't really comment on your son's development from this short article you wrote. However, a lack of words by 17 months and an earlier comment in the article about his 'lack of interest' in communicating before starting baby signs is concerning. Has he had a hearing test? That should be a first step for any child with 'speech delay'. I'm glad he will have an evaluation by early intervention/speech therapy as well. Please discuss your concerns with your child's pediatrician.

    posted by : anon on 10/17/2008 at 6:11 AM Flag For Abuse

  12. It is quite clear in the research that signing does not cause speech delays. That's an ill-informed anxiety. If your son DOES have a speech delay, signing will help and you'll be glad you taught him.

    I am teaching my kids ASL as a second language (not "baby signs") and it is just like any other second language and has all the known benefits. My older daughter picked up on written language far earlier than other children her age (and earlier than really makes developmental sense) and I'm convinced it is because having two languages gave her a sense of the symbolic aspect of language (like writing) earlier than is typical in monolingual children.

    If you don't want to sign with your child, don't. It's no big deal one way or the other, but is certainly isn't damaging!

    posted by : Shannon LC Cate on 10/17/2008 at 9:25 AM Flag For Abuse

  13. As a pediatrician and mom to a toddler, I agree that teaching your son sign language did NOT cause speech delay, and, if there is one, it is likely transient and he will catch up and surpass his peers like other posters have said. I agree he should likely be verbalizing more at this point, so any "early intervention" certainly can't hurt, but a lot of specialists (pediatric neurologists, pediatric behavior and developmental experts, will count signs as words. This being said, most 18 month olds have 6-8 words. It sounds as if your son is signing at least this many words, so he could very well be right on target.

    posted by : colemom33 on 10/17/2008 at 10:22 AM Flag For Abuse

  14. not talking at 17 months is absolutely not a reason for concern. Your big question should be more about understanding. Does he understand simple requests? Does he look at things you verbally point out, i.e. here comes daddy. I am a highly verbal stay at home mom who also uses some signs (a result of the work I did) and both my boys are fairly late talkers. The first did not start until 18 months and really did not take off until 2 and my second sporadically uses about 10 words (when he feels like it, never on request) and he is 21 months. I am not concerned at all as he understands a lot. RELAX! Remember not to aniticipate your child`s every whim and need but give them room to initiate. Play dumb - some kids need a lot of motivation to articulate. Give them some time to respond - count to three before you jump in. Remember that we are talking about communication and not words - at 17 months, the most important thing is your childs attempts to communicate and have their needs met, not the number of words they produce. Please do not promote the idea that sign language impedes a healthy childs development - it does not. Where would you be right now if your child had no words AND no signs - probably with a frustrated child. We all have our expectations that if we do this the right way and that the right way we will not have everyone elses problems - then your child with all of their unique characteristics shows up and throws your best laid plans out the window. Forget about experts and advice and just go with the unique flow of who your little fellow is - stop counting and keeping score folks!! Remember, Einstein did not speak until he was 6....

    posted by : talksalot on 10/17/2008 at 11:12 AM Flag For Abuse

  15. some people made some interesting points about the fact that when you teach a kid two languages at the same time, one may be delayed a bit. that's probably what's going on. I went through all the same phases (almost giving up around 12 months and then a sign appeared a couple weeks later "duck" and then it just took off, "more", "milk", "hot" "cold", etc it was so exciting and felt so rewarding especially at a time where I was about to give up) but my son started making noises and saying mama and dada around 9-10 months. keep it up. he will be bi-lingual and he will eventually speak!! teaching him sign language was a great idea. dont beat yourself up about it.

    posted by : ls on 10/17/2008 at 11:30 AM Flag For Abuse

  16. Did you vaccinate your child? My child regressed after his vaccinations and went from babbling to nothing. He is now 19 mo. old (no more vaccines after 6 mo. old) and if only I could turn back time - he wouldn't have received a single vaccine period. Vaccines cause brain damage and no, it is not just about the mercury. It is about all of the other garbage that is in them. Delays are usually a sign of future problems - learning disabilities.

    posted by : dawn2000k on 10/17/2008 at 12:23 PM Flag For Abuse

  17. The Gay Uncle attempts to insert some levity in the conversation by sharing his thoughts on signing to babies.

    http://brettberk.com/2008/04/17/whats-your-sign/

    posted by : UncleBrett on 10/17/2008 at 8:23 PM Flag For Abuse

  18. It kind of sounds like you had some strange methods of signing with him. (though I don't at all think you caused any kind of delay) It sounds like you were so eager to have him sign something, anything.. that you were very arbitrary with your comments back to him. "good sign son" just taught him to make lots of random signs like a trained animal. It was your job to get that early signing into a real context that related to his real experiences, and not overwhelm him with signs he didn't need. So while I don't think you caused any kind of speech delay, I do think you caused his strange sounding signing usage.

    posted by : FreshAir on 10/18/2008 at 2:01 PM Flag For Abuse

  19. hey there-- I really don't think you should worry. I don't know what the statistics are, but I can say I signed with my two sons, now almost six and just turned two. Both boys were a little bit later than their peers in terms of talking. My two year old has just begun the talking explosion, but at his 18-month check up the dr did raise an eyebrow. She said if he's not talking by the time he's two we might want to look into it. Now he's two and he's really talking pretty well. He started toddler school at the end of August, and at that time I felt the need to put together a signing glossary for his teachers. I posted it here:

    http://catherine.blog-city.com/little_boy_launched.htm


    But now, not even two months later he's almost talking all the time, and only falls back on sign when he's tired or sick or can't think of the word he's looking for. My older son, signed up to about the same age and then started talking a blue streak and has never stopped. I do feel that signing was a big help in creating lines of communication and also in vocabulary building. I think the key with signing to a toddler is to focus on the content, not the form. Thus praising the signing itself might be confusing, but saying "I hear the doggy too" would be a solid confirmation that you understand what he's trying to get across to you. It really might happen almost over night that he gets the hang of talking. Good luck

    posted by : cleverland on 10/18/2008 at 4:25 PM Flag For Abuse

  20. Save your money and skip the speech therapist. Your pediatrician is an idiot. He's overreacting- and so are you. I've dealt with children - hundreds of them in my practice, and I can assure you ALL of them learned to talk by the time they got to school. Let me share with you a true story:

    I was called in to help a mother who's 3-1/2 year old still hadn't spoken a word [it was her first child]. She'd tried everything and was terrified her little angel- we' call her Karen- wouldn't ever speak. I suggested mom ignore everything Karen did- all the signs toddlers make, all the grunts, all the tugs on her leg...everything, until she said a recogizeable word.

    A couple days later I got a call from the mother. They'd had the in-law over for dinner, and everyone'd been firmly instructed to ignore little Karen unless she asked for something out loud. Karen tried to get their attention every way imaginable- except verbally. Then came dinner. Karen was getting more and more frustrated as things were being passed, and nobody was giving her what she wanted. All of a sudden Karen blurted out in perfectly clear English "GIVE ME THE DAMNED MAYNONAISE!"

    They all praised her for her use of spoken words -ignoring the cuss word and mispronounciation, and the problem was solved.

    If you simply calm down, stop making such a fuss and let things take their own way, your child will speak when they're ready - or when you make it impossible for them to get what they want any other way.

    ************************************************************************

    As for the mother who wrote her child 'regressed after being vaccinated', and that 'vaccines cause brain damage', she is a few slices short of a full loaf. Vaccines DO NOT cause brain damage. Nor do they cause regression. However, there may have been another type of trauma that co-incided with the doctor's visit- the child may have been sexually or physically abused though you aren't aware of it. THAT type of change in a child definitely needs investigating!

    As for not vaccinating a child, wait until you have your child come down with measles, mumps, whooping cough or worst of all, POLIO: these diseases are on the rise again after almost being eradicated, and we are seeing outbreaks growing in number each year. We've had epidemics the like not seen in 60 years because of parents who've been using Internet scare sites to guide these critical decisions instead of sound medicine, and listening to crackpots who get off on conspiracy theories & spout fake data on harm caused by vaccines - NONE of which is true.

    Some parents are still afraid of mercury [Thiorosal] in vaccines: guess what- they took that component out of almost all vaccines over a decade ago! By not vaccinating your child you are not only putting them & other children at risk, but the elderly (including Nana and Gramps) at risk as well. I cannot begin to tell you the suffering some of these older adults have to go thru - some for the rest of their lives- after being exposed to chicken pox & developing shingles. Oh, and don't forget that chicken pox can cause severe scarring of the face and is unbearably itchy. The vaccine may not prevent chicken pox 100% but it can make the course of it lighter and shorter.

    I suggest you check out the horrible consequences of contracting polio: many of those poor kids ended up on ventilators for the rest of their short lives(the old fashioned 'iron lungs') because of paralysis. Others were paraplegics or quadriplegics for life. Remember, there is NO cure for polio once contracted. 2007 & 2008 were the highest incidences of polio since 1977. You cannot tell if someone is a carrier by looking, and we have many, many immigrants and visitors from other lands - though- in all honest, since there are a rising number of US parents ignoring doctors' recommendations and thinking they know better than the CDC.

    Or maybe Measles- how about deafness? One of the effects of Measles is sensori-neural hearing loss, caused as the disease attacks the sensory cells of the inner ear. Once hearing is damaged in this way, you DON'T get it back. The only treatment is - sometimes- hearing aids. Measles is a very nasty disease and has myriad effects on children, of which the permanent hearing loss is probably the least.

    1:1000 children who contract Measles develop encephalitis - an inflammation of the brain. We have to put them into isolation in PICU, and give them high doses of Vit A, fluids, antivirals and prayer. THERE IS NO SPECIFIC TREATMENT FOR MEASLES ONCE CONTRACTED.
    , blindness/bilateral cataracts, or learning disabilities that are almost impossible to treat?

    You want to talk brain damage? Try mumps with it's sky-high fevers that don't come down with antipyretics such as Tylenol or Motrin - wait until your child as a 108 degree fever for three days - then see their learning abilities fail.

    This is the reason children who aren't vaccinated are banned from schools- they are walking time bombs who endanger all the rest of the kids. I don't know which is worse: them living with the after effects of contracting these diseases, or dying young because of them.,

    I hope you find out what really happened to your little one. But, regardless, it is unforgivable not to get your child vaccinated. I will pray your child -in your ignorance - does not suffer any fatal or lifelong harm, nor does anyone with whom they come into contact.

    posted by : Logikal1 on 10/18/2008 at 7:34 PM Flag For Abuse

  21. Totally anecdotal, but a friend of mine has a son who signed copiously and only spoke a couple of words at eighteen months. He started speaking in earnest shortly thereafter and by twenty-one months was talking in full sentences. He's now three-and-a-half and is one of the more verbal boys I've seen at that age.

    posted by : frank on 10/19/2008 at 8:57 AM Flag For Abuse

  22. Wow you are so wrong about sign, in my opinion. My son is 2 will be 3 in April. He started signing at a year and now picks it up so easily.

    He didt start talking til just a month or so ago and let me tell you there is nothing wrong with my son. He is very intelligent to be able to pick up sign.

    Now he is talking when I tell him to say thank you I do the sign as well then he says thanks you and does the sign at the same time.

    I HIGHLY reccomend signing for anyone with youngins on here.

    posted by : Yankee on 10/19/2008 at 2:24 PM Flag For Abuse

  23. My son is now 3.5 years old. We did the signing thing he really seemed to catch on when he was around a year old. Mostly he signed more, drink, eat and I know there were more, but those were the most prevalent. Anyhow, my son was quiet for a long time too but did babble alot and say daaaaaaaaaaaa all the freakin' time. Anyhow, my point is that I understand how you feel. Whereas, my child did talk, he said teletubby (which came out as teletub) before he said ANYTHING that slightly resembled ma, mom or mama...and when he finally did he was nearing 2 YEARS OLD! But of course, he could/would say da, dada, daddy, and would even sometimes call my husband Tom! And I nursed this child for two years! Robbed, I tell you!!! My son is really smart but he is having to go to speech therapy twice a week. He talks ALOT but there are many times when most people can't understand him so my husband and I are his translators. It seems to me that boys are predominantly the ones that seem to need speech therapy. But that's because I've run across so many people recently and I think only one of them had a daughter that needed it. Anyhow, good luck and I'm sure that everything will be fine! :)

    posted by : PrettyLilMoon on 10/19/2008 at 5:32 PM Flag For Abuse

  24. A lot of the above posters are saying the research shows no delays in speech.Yet I don't see anyone citing any of that research that your trying to reassure the writer with.

    Could you perhaps posts some links to some verifiable research?

    My son is 14 months old and my wife and I debated about whether or not to teach him sign language and after a lot of looking and Emailing a few doctors(including our pediatrician) we decided against it. Not because there was any wrong with signing, but that there is not enough evidence or any studies that we could find that show a real benefit for children.

    At 14 months almost 15 my son is able to say mama and dada along with a few other words. I'm not bragging just posting my experience with my only child, it certainly cannot be considered the standard.

    posted by : Donald on 10/20/2008 at 12:50 PM Flag For Abuse

  25. Signing, as described here, is not a second language. This type of "baby signing" can be helpful to children's language development, but it is used in conjunction with English. American Sign Language is a bona fide language that takes years to learn. It is just as proposterous to claim that you are teaching your child a second language by introducing 20 or so French vocabulary words and then only use them without conjugation or in any kind of French syntax. It's insulting to claim that your child "knows sign language" when in fact he or she knows a limited number of English signs.

    It is true that learning two languages can result in slower language growth initially, but that doesn't apply here at all since the child is actually only using the one language: English.

    posted by : itchybrain on 10/23/2008 at 10:19 PM Flag For Abuse

  26. Donald--

    As I mentioned, signing CAN cause an INITIAL delay, but studies show increased verbal aptitude later on (though I would hesitate to say that benefit is causation).

    People did not provide links because this is actually widely accepted in the scientific and medical community...that's why I'm so surprised to hear Sign Language being blamed. A little bit of research would show that it does not cause any long-term delays.

    Here are a handful of links, but all you'd have to do is Google some studies. Also, many signing books reference studies in the intro. Just check out your local library.

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8060750

    http://www.literacytrust.org.uk/talktoyourbaby/gestureresearch.html

    http://www.cal.org/resources/Digest/RaiseBilingChild.html

    However, signing is only going to give the benefits of a second language if you use it like a second language. Just doing baby signs occasionally won't cut it.

    We liked signing because I knew exactly what my daughter wanted before she spoke.

    posted by : CaliMama on 10/28/2008 at 10:53 AM Flag For Abuse

  27. all my, i loved your artical. i found it amusing. you wouldn't believe how much your story sounded like mine. my 3 yr old son was born 13 wks early, weighed 1 lb 14 oz. At first i thought of many different reasons why this could be that he wasn't talking, i mean it wasn't much of a problem until about 18 mnths or so. then the need for communication was out of contrl, he had not said mom, dad, no, he didn't say anything except babel. well i had seen this v-tech program that offered sign language. we sat down and learned just a few baby signs. drink, eat, thankyou, ect....i saw he picked up on it great for being 1 1/2. like you said 7 o'clock in the morning i was waking up to him pointing his finger in his mouth. at first it wasn't bad, but after a while, i just wanted to scream. i would feed him everything i could think of, he was constintly telling me he was hungry or "eat". i thought "eat eat eat eat eat wwwwhhhhhhhhaaaaaaaaatttttttt!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!" i know wher you are coming from. it can be frustrating for the both of you. but with out it look how much more frustrating it would be or would hae been. my son is 3yrs old now, and he still don't talk. well he tries, i have definatly seen him do as much trying as i do. he says ma da ba(ball) he barks for a dog and tries to get the da sound out.he says blue perfect. he does now say ea for eat. he tries to say just about anything you ask him to say to.  stay strong, and remember it's just a frustrating for him as it is you. don't put the blame on yourself. maybe he hasn't needed to say nothing because of signing, but in th long run i feel it benefits all children. now that my daughter is getting to that talking stage, my opinion is that we should teach children the sign for each word they learn.
    thank you for your story, i at least know there's more mom's out there with te same problem....

    posted by : cattone on 2/17/2009 at 6:47 PM Flag For Abuse

  28.     It can be scary if your child has a speech delay -- let's blame sign language!
        It is a tragedy if your child is diagnosed with a severe developmental disability -- let's blame vaccines!
        I tried to teach my babies ASL and I am fluent in it.  It was hard to sign consistently enough that my kids used the ASL.  All they learned was "mom", "more", "milk", "eat" "finished" and "I love you."  Still, that was a lot better than "wah!"  "wah!"  "wah!" etc.
       It is just silly to imply that there is any downside to teaching a child some sign language.  Most people who teach their kids "baby sign language" learn 5 to 20 signs and pair them with the spoken word for that sign.  By contrast, your baby is exposed to tens of thousands of spoken words each year just by hearing you talk to your partner, shop or speak on the phone.  The only thing that is going to be delayed in this scenario is learning sign language, not speech.
        Even the author of the article notes that her son started signing, a lot, at the age of 8 months.  Babies cannot physically produce much, if any, understandable speech at this age.  You may be able to understand a word or two s/he tries to say, but that's it.
        I work with Deaf people professionally.  Deaf parents, who sign with their (mostly hearing) babies all the time, report that their infants sign their first words at age 4 to 6 months.  That is a lot quicker than a baby can learn how to talk.
        Deaf folks are the only ASL-using parents who need to worry about speech delays because no one may be modeling speech for their kids.
        Typical infants and toddlers are wired to learn language.  Both of my kids go to a play-based preschool.  Each classroom has 2 teachers.  One teacher speaks to the kids only in English and the other only speaks to them in Chinese.
        I have observed hundreds of children in this program over 3 years.  Almost all the kids enter school understanding/speaking just one language.  Within about 6 months they understand when spoken to in the 2nd language.  After 9 to 18 months they are speaking it.  They are NOT "studying" Chinese, they are just playing with other kids.  But when the teacher offers them milk she says it in Chinese and they have learned the language without any effort.
        The children in this program who have language delays are few and would have presumably have had delays anyway.
        Americans may be the only people on the planet who commonly think that kids will get confused if exposed to more than one language.  Children in the rest of the world frequently learn or are exposed to several languages simultaneously.  If the American model was the best one for language learning, Americans would be the most multi-lingual people instead of being among the most mono-lingual.

    posted by : WhyNotASL on 3/15/2009 at 1:09 PM Flag For Abuse

  29. I wouldn't worry yet. Each child is different. If you are talking to him, reading to him and he understands sign language, that is a great start. When you are signing with him, say the words and speak to him in conversational speech.  It takes hearing things repeatedly and often. It is wonderful if he can sign it and say it.  Babies can learn the written language along with the verbal also. It takes repetition and hearing, seeing, feeling, touching things many times

    posted by : Suesbooks on 7/18/2009 at 9:20 PM Flag For Abuse

  30. I am a "baby signing" mom with a toddler who knows ~80 signs and significantly fewer spoken words. There will be kids who speak a little later than others, those who walk a little later than others, those who cut teeth later than others. Variation between children in achieving milestones is expected and is normal. I cannot imagine how providing an added avenue for communication can be a bad thing. Nor have I been convinced after all of the reading I have done that teaching signs can in any way delay speech.
    I loved this article and the postings it generated (well, all except for the "vaccines causing regression" one; loved the retort, Logikal1). I chuckled reading parts of the article because I can empathize. I am familiar with the passion of a parent who has chosen to sign with his/her infant or toddler and wants to stick it out until the effort pays off (I promise it does eventually). I laughed out loud when I heard my own private thoughts echoed that "if I don't recognize and affirm each and every sign produced by my child, the signing and communicating will stop." And I too occasionally regret teaching my son to sign (just today, I thought to myself, "I wish you couldn't sign, Child, so I could pretend I don't know you want the bottle of bubbles on the top of the fridge for the quadrillionth time in one hour"). 
    Thanks for offering a window into the signing mom's mind. You have done nothing wrong!  

    posted by : Signing is harmless fun on 8/11/2009 at 9:55 PM Flag For Abuse


   
  
 
 
   


Click here to login and post feedback using your login name or
Post feedback anonymously using this alias :


New This Week


What's New on Babble

Daily Poll

Are you hitting the stores on Black Friday?