Hey folks --
Rufus Griscom, CEO Of Nerve Media here.
This
is the history: Nerve Media has always had a policy of using Flickr
photos ONLY with permission from the photographer, and with credit
given to the photographer. When we first launched Babble a large
portion of the photographs that accompanied articles were from Flickr,
and in every case the photographer gave us permission prior to the
posting (incidentally about 95% of people we ask have historically been
happy to give us permission).
In the last week it has come to
our attention that a new member of the photo department recently pulled
photos that had marked "public" without asking for permission. She
believed, after reading the Flickr "creative commons" license terms,
that it was okay to do so because she thought it fell under
non-commercial use.
This was a huge error -- we were very upset
about this, and as soon as it we learned about it we took down all such
photos. We were contacted by, I think, 3 photographers who had this
problem (one of whom posted about it on Flickr) and in every case we
apologized profusely and made sure there photo was removed immediately.
The reports of a long history of intentional use of private photos is
entirely inaccurate -- all photos posted prior to arrival of this
employee were posted with permission.
The Babble team is
comprised of writers, photographers, and young parents, and we are as a
rule very concerned about both the privacy of families and the rights
of content creators. Alisa and I (co-publishers of Babble) have our
family photos on flickr -- http://www.flickr.com/photos/declan/ -- and
we would be equally upset if we found our photos used commercially
without clearance ... this was a major screw up, and you can be
confident that it will not happen again.
Sincerely,
Rufus
p.s. If anyone has any concerns about these incidents feel free to e-mail me directly at rufus@babble.com.