<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://babble.com/CS/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Angie's Adoption Agency Says She Got No Preferential Treatment</title><link>http://babble.com/CS/blogs/strollerderby/archive/2007/03/20/angie-s-adoption-agency-says-she-got-no-preferential-treatment.aspx</link><description>So Angelina Jolie is a celebrity and clearly used her name and fame to fast-track her most recent adoption, right? Or she must have given some big donation to the adoption agency or to the orphanage her new son came from, right? Wrong. According to Adoptions</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007.1 (Build: 20910.1126)</generator></channel></rss>