Strollerderby : jamie lynn spears

Britney Spears Will Cancel Tour If Kids Can't Come

Brett Singer — Mon, 02 Feb 2009 23:00:00 GMT

Famecrawler and TMZ are reporting that Britney Spears says that she won't tour if her kids can't join her.

When I first saw this I thought, "Oh good. Another loony celeb mom who wants to drag her young'uns around the globe. What's wrong with these people?"

Upon further reading, it seems that Brit wants to set things up so that Sean Preston and Jayden James would stay put at three different "bases" in New Jersey, New Orleans, and Los Angeles. Mama Britney would "commute" from her shows to the home bases, thereby enabling her to tour and see the boys.

Why is this even a story? Because Britney, her family Jamie Spears (not to be confused with Jamie LYNN Spears, Britney's sister) and Kevin Federline (K-Fed) worked out this deal on their own. Without the lawyers. And that, my friends, is a veddy bad idea.

According to TMZ, K-Fed's lawyer Mark Vincent Kaplan says that the situation, "could have been handled better if Jamie and company would have 'manned up' and had Kevin got the benefit of his lawyers to protect his position." K-Fed's attorney will present his own version of the deal, thereby justifying his existence and removing a roadblock to the deal going through – his ego.

Regarding that last paragraph: I'm not sure that I'm correct about that analysis, but I think I am.

Here's what I have a problem with here. As a parent, I would think that Britney and K-Fed would want to keep the details of their custody battle private. If Britney's dad can work out a deal with them, why is K-Fed's lawyer jumping in and mucking up the works, and possibly leaking the information to the press? Again: I need to say that I don't know if Mr. Kaplan, K-Fed's attorney, leaked anything. But he did provide a quote to TMZ about Jamie Spears "manning up". What kind of language is that? Why not keep things as cordial as possible? I understand him wanting to look for K-Fed's interests. But why insult the kids' grandfather, who is also in charge of Britney's interests at the moment?

As for Britney touring or not, I think that she's entitled to go out on the road since that's her job. If it were Federline who had a successful career (or any career at all, frankly), I seriously doubt that anyone would be concerned with what happens to the kids, despite that fact that he has custody. I don't think it's a great idea for kids to be schlepped all over the globe while mom prances around in stadiums wearing Spandex. But if they can work out a way to do it so that the kids aren't overly inconvenienced, what's wrong with that? Anglina Jolie and Brad Pitt bring those kids all over the place and nobody seems to mind.

I have to admit that reading this story, my eyes started to roll back in my head. Even keeping straight which Jamie Spears they're talking about – the father or the sister – starts to get difficult after awhile. Maybe I need to read more gossip magazines.

Source: Famecrawler, TMZ

Bart Simpson-Scientologist

Sarah Palin Says Leave My Kids Alone

Ann Coulter Says Single Moms Are Bad For Society

Indiana Planned Parenthood Sells Gift Certificates

Brett Singer — Sun, 07 Dec 2008 16:00:00 GMT

From the Chicago Tribune:

"What do you get the person who has everything—except adequate health insurance? If you live in Indiana, consider this offering from the state's Planned Parenthood affiliate: gift certificates in $25 increments."

In news even less surprising than Clay Aiken coming out of the closet, anti-choice groups are not happy. The Tribune quotes Jim Sedlak, who is with both the American Life League and Stop Planned Parenthood (where DOES he find the time?) as saying that the gift cards are just PP's "annual [attack] on the Christian community at Christmastime...[Planned Parenthood] could easily have said, 'these certificates are not to be used for abortions.' But they intentionally chose not to do that." Because I'm sure that Planned Parenthood spends most of their time thinking about how they can ruin Christmas for Christians everywhere.

Now my initial reaction was a great big ol' "Huh?" Luckily my mother was present when I heard this news (on The Daily Show). She pointed out, as does president and CEO of Planned Parenthood of Indiana Betty Cockrum, that most of what PP does is "provide basic health care." In fact, Cockrum says that's 95 percent of what they do. Still, "a pap smear in a Pear Tree" doesn't sound very appealing.

All joking aside (you can see Jon Stewart's slightly reluctant mirth-making on this topic in the video below), I guess this isn't as weird as it sounds. It's not weirder than a doctor's office selling gift cards. Well, that would be weird too. The underlying message of providing health care is a good one. But who do you buy one of these cards for? The Duggar family? Jon and Kate? Kevin Federline? (I know, it's about health care, not just birth control. The jokes are almost too easy. If Jon Stewart can apologize, so can I!) I guess in theory you could pick one up for someone you know who doesn't have health care. But isn't that incredibly awkward? "Hi, I know you're uninsured, so I thought you could use one of these. Happy holidays!" I would love to know how many cards Planned Parenthood Indiana (who have the unfortunate acronym PPIN – say it out loud and then make a Beavis and Butthead chuckling noise) actually sells. So far, they say they've sold about twelve. This isn't Vegas, but I'm putting the over-under at 25. Anyone want to take that action?

The Daily Show With Jon StewartM - Th 11p / 10c

Planned Parenthood Gift Cards

Barack Obama Interview
John McCain Interview

Sarah Palin Video
Funny Election Video

Source: The Daily Show, Chicago Tribune

Image: PPIN

Things You Should Never Say To A Nursing Mother

Babble's Ultimate Holiday Gift Guide

Girly Gift Guide

Make Your Own Religious Doll

The Birth of the Duggar’s 18th Child Will be Televised

White House Sends Chanukah Card With Christmas Tree On It

Kevin Federline Answers To One Name: Daddy

Rite Aid Says They Will Stop Selling Expired Baby Products

Morning News: Did McCain Refuse to Shake Hands With 'That One'?

Madeline Holler — Wed, 08 Oct 2008 13:30:00 GMT

Two big moments in an otherwise snoozy debate. (Oh, come on! No one even wore gloves to take off.) The incident, which was immediately hyper-analyzed, came when John McCain referred to Barack Obama as "that one."

Was that subtle racism?

Nahhh, say most, even the leftier lefties. Was it shrewd. Not really that either. We thought it made him sound like Old Mr. Cranky Pants. (Speaking of Old Mr. Cranky Pants -- has Tom Brokaw always been such a clock-watching school marm. Give the stern lectures on time limits a rest, buddy!)

The other big moment -- actually, we should just call it the something we haven't heard before -- was when John McCain unveiled a new big idea on how to rescue mainstreet. He wants the U.S. government to buy up failing mortgages directly from homeowners. He said this would keep home values from falling. When's someone going to speak honestly and say the homes in most of the spiraling markets were way overvalued anyway?

Also up for discussion? Did McCain refuse to shake Obama's hand at the end of the night? Doubtful. But see, that's how boring things got.

Possiby more exciting? These superhero comic books that tell the life stories of our two candidates. Truth be told: we want the Sarah Palin issue!

We said it! Time for our Daily Palin:

Did the "babe factor" play a role in her selection as VP candidate?

No wonder she's so popular. She's related to Princess Diana!

Will Palin have to stop her "palling around with terrorists" comments since her running mate has now been linked to a group in the Iran-Contra affair. How will Elisabeth Hasselbeck explain that to the ladies?

Palin might owe the state of Alaska even more money than we thought yesterday. Further scrutiny of her tax returns raises the question: should she pay tax when she charged the state for her and her family to stay and eat at home?

Perhaps as a part of our homeland security, Americans -- especially Alaskans -- should own one of these DVDs. You know, in case Putin rears his expert Judo grappling maneuvers.

A freaky/surprising/probably totally benign video is making the rounds. Some boys in a Kansas City charter middle school do a military style chant in support of Barack Obama. The teacher's getting called into the principal's office over the whole thing (Fox News got its paws on it, so ...). These guys, all poor African Americans who happen to live in a city where the public school district has, in the past, lost its accreditation, make radical claims like, "Because of Barack Obama, I'm going to be an architect." Commies.

Oh, and mother Jamie Lynnn Spears claims she's taking the baby and getting out of Hollywood. Our bet? Won't last.

And if you're not reading The Daily Beast, Tina Brown's version of Huffington Post, you're not alone.

Morning News: You Naughty Alaskans!

Morning News: Who's Winning with Only 30 Days Left?

Photos: LATimes.com, Daily Mail

Tyra Banks Talks to Wanna-be Teen Moms

Hannah Tennant-Moore — Fri, 19 Sep 2008 20:30:00 GMT

Guests on last night’s Tyra Banks Show included a pregnant 13-year-old who used to want to be a lawyer, but who now says, without a tone of regret, that she doesn’t think she’ll make it to college. A 14-year-old who is actively trying to get pregnant said that she believes that her boyfriend would “probably marry” her if she got pregnant—unless he decides he doesn’t want to be with her anymore “for some reason.” Perhaps that reason could be going to college instead of continuing to mow lawns to support his family? This teenager also said that she wants a baby because she thinks baby showers are just so “fun and adorable!” Tyra wisely reminded her that a baby shower lasts for two hours.

I’d like to pass the topic of this show off as one of those sensational trends that gets a lot of media coverage but doesn’t necessarily reflect real life. But the fact is, one in three teenage girls will become pregnant before she turns 20—that’s the highest rate of teen pregnancy in the industrialized world. And teen pregnancy rates in the U.S. are on the rise for the first time in 15 years.

It’s clear from listening to these girls talk that they are lacking something fundamental—a sense of control over their lives or the experience of unconditional love, to put it broadly. Adolescence is such a difficult time of life and the thought that one could have a tiny, adorable being to devote one’s self to—rather than having to work to forge a life for one’s self—could be appealing to some youth. But, naturally, this fantasy is nothing like the reality of being a teen mom.

Young men and women need not only comprehensive sex education, but parenting and marriage education that explains that these are not states into which one enters lightly. And almost all of the media hubbub over teen pregnancy has focused on girls. What about the boys who are getting these girls pregnant? They need to understand the consequences of their actions just as much as girls do, including the risk that having sex at such a young age will make their partners long for, and perhaps seek, more commitment than they can handle.

Thanks to Jezebel, you can watch a clip of the last night’s show here.

Photo: informedvoters.wordpress.com

Are Shotgun Weddings the Best Answer to Teen Pregnancy?

Should a C-Section Earn You a Bad Eco-Grade?

Madeline Holler — Fri, 01 Aug 2008 17:01:00 GMT

I was super excited when I saw the feature Celebrity Birthing Footprints over on the eco-fashion website Sprig. All the recent big-name baby producers are represented in their slideshow (as well as a few smaller ones -- hey, Ethan Hawke's lady just gave birth). And there's nothing I love more than taking down environmentally self-righteous celebs, whose carbon/trash/consumer footprints alone are waaaaaaaaay huger than an entire new housing development's silly Hummer-driving, McMansion-erecting, meat-eating suburbanites.

Alas, the piece disappoints. First, none of these celebrities is doing anything more than the rest of us to go green -- even superficially. Second, the little project is inconsistent -- there's no rubric for how they're determining letter grades.

Plus, I think I uncovered this dirty little secret: they're dinging celebrities who got c-sections! (I mean, maybe c-sections are melting polar icecaps, but then they need to point that out.)

Summary:

A's went out to Jessica Alba, Jack Black and Soleil Moon-Frye. Oddly, Jack Black gets the A for saying if he were president, each car in the country would have a solar panel on the roof. (Wow! So engaged!)

Know who gets a C? Tori Spelling, whom they congratulate for using cloth diapers. But she had a c-section, so I suppose she's lucky she didn't flunk.

Other C's, a D and a D- go out to Jamie Lynn Spears, Christina Aguilera, Jennifer Lopez and Angelina Jolie (who's international birthing needs cancel out any recycling and Prius-driving they may do around the Chateau). Anyway, you tell me, what do these baby-makers have in common? That's right: surgical birth.

My conspiracy theory unravels with Nicole Ritchie. She earned a C+, but from what I can find online, she gave birth vaginally. So why the low grade? Toxic oversized sunglasses?

Here's what I would have liked to see: more talk about these very rich people committing to smaller homes, smaller cars, less air travel (please stop going to Vegas for the weekend, Christina), lower water use, lower consumption overall (for God's sake, rewear something once in a while). And, yes, maybe solar panels as far as the eye can see (though not on the roof of the car. Do you know what that would do to the gas mileage?)

It's Hard Out There for a Mom Who Says 'No'

18 Kids From One Vagina: Woman Births 18th Child

Condom Maker Offers $1Mil to Miley Cyrus to Sell Rubbers

Photo: Sprig.com

Is it fair to take pictures of Britney's kids?

Brett Singer — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 01:53:00 GMT

You may have heard about the photographs of Britney Spears smoking while 2-year-old Sean Preston was playing with her cigarette lighter. Well, the actual photo doesn't quite show that. Here it is:

Now, far be it from me to disagree with the celebrity media machine, but this doesn't look as bad as it sounds. In this pic she looks to be taking the cigarettes away from her child. That would be the right thing to do. The better thing to do would be to not smoke at all, and especially not in front of your kids. Second-hand smoke is very dangerous, especially to little lungs. It also makes me wonder if she was smoking while pregnant, which would be much worse. My guess – and I have nothing to back this up – is that she probably was. As a former smoker, I know how hard it is to quit, and it looks to me like the Britster is quite the nicotine addict.

Here's the part that gets me: the photos were taken at her house. Why? Presumably a photog with a mega-ultra-zoom lens – a "Pavarotti", as El Federline famously referred to them on his ill-fated rap album – was suspended from a helicopter or something and took the shot through her window or on her balcony.

She's a celebrity, and over 18 (although emotionally she might be, like, 12, but let's not go there). But her kids aren't. Not to sound like a celebrity defending dipstick ("LEAVE...BRITNEY...ALONE!"), but maybe there should be a law that prevents the kids from being photographed, at least when they're at home. As someone points out over at MomLogic, they didn't ask to be in this bizarre situation.

There are celebrities whose children you almost never see candid pictures of – Madonna, Howard Stern, Christie Brinkley, and I'm sure there are dozens more that I can't think of at the moment. Of course, those people aren't the unbelievable mess that Brit appears to be. At best, this photo shows poor judgment on her part, not only the smoking but also hanging out with her kid in front of an open window where a sleazoid photographer can get a clear shot. Um, curtains? A really high hedge? Move someplace else?

Of course, if nobody wanted to see the pictures, they wouldn't be worth anything, and photographers wouldn't take them. But that's a different topic.

Here are the rest of the photos. Hey, at least she looks pretty good in her bikini.

images: popsugar.com

Britney - Babe-A-Licious Again!

When playgrounds attack, the sequel

20 Disturbing Baby Products

S&M Barbie

Lourdes and Miley kidnapped?

20 mil for pics of twins

When Cynthia called Cindy

Who Would You Name Your Local Sewage Plant After?

Rich or Rehab: Whatever Happened to the Girl From 'Love, Sidney'?

Michael Savage says kids with autism need to get over themselves

Celebrity Baby Naming Hits New Low

Best of FameCrawler: Week of July 11th

Whit Honea — Fri, 11 Jul 2008 20:00:00 GMT

Preg-a-licious! Is Fergie Expecting?

Photos Of Maddie Briann, They're Official

Sexy Superhero Parents: The Top 10

Is Michael Jackson Dying?

Nicole Kidman's Dad Reveals Secret of Sunday's Name!!

THESE Two Are The Hottest Celebrity Parents, For Seriously

Photos! Who Is Diana Bianchi?

Wanted: Nanny for the World's Most Famous Family

Angelina's Due Date - Got It!!!!

Angie And Brad's New Baby!

Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt's Baby Names!

Angelina's Paparazzi Proof Room

Jamie Lynn Spears Unveils Her Baby, Wants to Be Normal

Cole Gamble — Wed, 09 Jul 2008 18:00:00 GMT

OK Magazine has pictures of Jamie Lynn Spears and her new baby girl, Maddie, on their upcoming cover. In the article inside Jamie Lynn hints at wanting a normal life for her and the baby.

In the article Jamie states she wants to raise the baby with her fiancee Casey Aldridge down in the South and that she just wants to "be a soccer mom." Besides the fact Jamie Lynn is only 17 years old and her sister is flaming mess Brittany Spears, Jamie appears to be seeking a very down-to-earth life with her husband-to-be and child. Could it be that this baby and mama are gonna be alright?

Photo: OK Magazine

Best of FameCrawler: Week of June 27th

Whit Honea — Fri, 27 Jun 2008 20:00:00 GMT

Billie Piper's Topless Role

The Sexualization of Miley Cyrus

Ben And Jen Together For Better Or Worse

Worst-Dressed Bellies? Top 5 Maternity Wear Mistakes Of Spring/Summer 2008

Tim McGraw and the Wife Beaters

Scott Kalitta Killed In Drag Racing Crash

Robert Downey, Jr., and Son: What's Wrong with This Picture?

Matthew McConaughey Is Ready To Rumble

Guess Who's Moving Across The Pond?

Jamie Lynn's Delivery Room Drama!

Tori Spelling Baby Photos!!

Best of FameCrawler: Week of June 20th

Whit Honea — Fri, 20 Jun 2008 20:00:00 GMT

Jennifer Aniston Is A Hater

C-Section For Jamie-Lynn Spears Baby

Ray Allen's Son: A Hard Week

OMG!! Baby # 2 On The Way So Soon?!!

Sienna Miller is Selfish

Sara Evans Wedding Photo

FIRST LOOK: Jessica Alba In Genlux Magazine

Angelina Jolie is One Cool Lady

Kate Beckinsale's Nude Shower Scene

Do You Know These Kids?

9 Celebrity Parents When They Were Children

Jamie Lynn's Family Makes First Statement About New Baby

Best of FameCrawler: Week of April 11

Whit Honea — Fri, 11 Apr 2008 20:00:00 GMT

Bobby Brown: I Was Whitney's Beard

Smoke Tom Cruise, Go Crazy

Woody Harrelson & Owen Wilson Swim Naked?

Tori Spelling's Pregnant Bikini Photo

Heather Mills Sends 8 Pages of Instructions To Hotel for Daughter Bea

Beyonce Bump Buzz

Twin Bumps! Lisa Marie Presley & Angelina Jolie

Tom Cruise: Leaving Katie, Taking Suri?

Heather Mills Nude Pics Finally Surface

Jamie Lynn Spears Goes Postal

Best of FameCrawler: Week of April 4

Whit Honea — Fri, 04 Apr 2008 20:00:00 GMT

Kate Hudson Is a Strict Mom

Video of Celebrity Babies with Secret Super Nanny: The FameCrawler April Fools

Robin Williams and His New "Nanny"

Katie Holmes' New Haircut: Fug, Or Just Sorta Fug?

Courteney Cox Wants Another Child

Jamie Lynn Spears in Hustler!

Future Mother Of George Clooney's Children Skanks It Up

Piping Hot: Giada De Laurentiis Has a Baby Girl

Suri Sighting! Suri Sighting!

The Bonham-Carter-Burtons Talk a Walk With Baby

Best of FameCrawler: Week of March 28

Whit Honea — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 20:15:00 GMT

Johnny Depp Has a Heart of Gold

More Hookers for Spitzer

Fergie Has A Bun In Her Oven

Jamie Lynn Spears And Casey Aldridge: ENGAGED

Michelle Williams' Family Squabble With Ledgers Over Heath's Will

'American Idol' Carly Smithson Pregnant?

Rapper Cavlar Killed

Victoria Beckham Makes Eva Longoria Look Pregnant

Suri? Suri? Where Is Suri Cruise?

Minnie Driver Needs a Huge Martini

Best of FameCrawler: Week of March 21

Whit Honea — Fri, 21 Mar 2008 20:00:00 GMT

Jennie Garth's Family Is a Croc

Is Fergie Pregnant?

WORLD EXCLUSIVE: Jennifer Lopez's Twins

Heidi Klum Talks About Her Sex Life, AGAIN

Ashley Dupre Video: Why My Daughters Will Spend Spring Break at Amish Camp

Halle Berry Gives Birth To A Daughter!

Parenting and Cheetos: A Comparison

JLo's Twins! Meet Max and Emme!

Jamie Lynn Dumps Casey Aldridge

Governors Gone Wild: Dina Matos McGreevey and the Three-Way

16-Year-Old Girl Gives Birth To Triplets...Um, Again

Kelly Mills — Sat, 23 Feb 2008 14:32:00 GMT

Plenty of people get upset about teen pregnancy, and this one makes Jamie Lynn Spears seem relatively chaste by comparison. A 16-year-old in Argentina just gave birth to triplets. Oh, and the mom and babies are doing well, thanks for asking. So why has this caused such a kerfuffle, touching off debates and criticism all over Argentina.

Well, um, it isn't her first set of triplets. She had her first baby at age 14, and then at age 15, triplets. Making these latest triplets at age 16 the second set, no fertility treatments. Yes, that's seven kids altogether, for those keeping score at home. Provincial authorities built the brood a home and donated land when the first triplets emerged, but now some folks are saying the girl needs birth control advice, not more financial assistance. And the girl's mom, who cleans houses to help support her daughter and many grandkids, says yes, they will be seeking help from the government.

Unmarried Celebrity Moms and Dads

Madeline Holler — Tue, 29 Jan 2008 18:37:00 GMT

MSNBC has a nice little gawky slideshow featuring famous couples who bear children without being married. It's a sidebar, cheekily titled "First Comes Baby" (then comes love?) and accompanies the main story on Jessica Alba, who is promoting her new movie and is also with child. The headline acts as meddling mother by promising her "thoughts on marriage."

Having given birth to both my kids before being forced to marry my partner to get health benefits (details provided here), I still feel a certain affinity to these couples who, for whatever reason, haven't bothered getting married -- now or yet or ever. And I tend to slice and dice all the codes and tones and extra commentary packed into the reportage. I like to see what terms the writers come up with for the main players. Like Erin's recent post on names for two mommies, unmarried couples don't have any agreed-upon references for their partners/girlfriends/husbands/SOs/etc.

So going through the slideshow, I did a little lexical inventory of what the baby mama/baby daddy get called and find it interesting that there's a difference, even though I can't figure out who gets to be called what. It's either "boyfriend/girlfriend" (for example, Halle Berry's, Matthew McConaughey's, Jamie Lynn Spears', Alba's, Nicole Richie's) or "longtime boyfriend/girlfriend" (Mark Wahlberg's). Only the Tim Robbins/Susan Sarandon industrial complex is referred to in terms of "partner."Brad and Angelina get to be called "a couple." Sacha Baron Cohen and Isla Fisher are spared the girlfriend/boyfriend tag, too, either because they're both actors or because, as their slide indicates, he proposed to her years ago.

Any unmarried couples out there want to chime in with terminological ideas for the celebrity press?

IIncidentally, if you read through the Alba story, she says, regarding marriage, "she's thought about it," but nothing more. We're not getting the details. Seems that unlike li'l Jamie Lynn Spears, she doesn't necessarily "want to get married real bad." I hear you, Jessica, I hear you.

Could We Lose These Parenting Terms In 2008?

Kelly Mills — Wed, 02 Jan 2008 14:33:00 GMT

The annual list of terms that deserve to be banned just came out, and I think it falls a litle short on the parenting lingo. When the mom and pop terms first appear, they maybe seem funny or twisted or innocuous or entertaining or whatever. Then they appear more and more, until finally you start to think if one more person refers to, say, "MILFs" you might have to barf--especially if it's in the "MILPH" sense. (Note to mommys making lingerie calendars--don't try and reclaim these terms in a faux-empowerment way, please.) They get overused and nauseating and when MSNBC uses them in a headline, you know the whole thing has so jumped the shark. It's over. Done. Let's erase the term from the lexicon and move on.

My nominees for this year's overused parenting terms: "baby-daddy" and "yummy mummy". Baby-daddy just got used here: "Jamie Lynn's baby-daddy a 'lying, cheating dog'." Sigh. Kill me now.Maybe you haven't seen "yummy mummy" as much as I have, because I have to troll both British and U.S. papers for parenting stories, but believe me, this U.K.-originated one is supposed to be a softer version of MILF, it's used regularly, and I didn't like it to begin with. So for 2008, let's start with a clean slate and replace these with something better, something you'll have to come up with because I don't invent language, I just bag on it. And nominate anything else you'd like to see stricken from the record for good.

Did Jamie Lynn Skip School? Sex Ed Makes Kids More Likely to Delay Sex

Kelly Mills — Fri, 21 Dec 2007 13:38:00 GMT

Could we get some no child left behind on this? In a survey of teens aged 15 to 19, those who had sex education in school were more likely to delay losing their virginity, at least till age 15. And among boys, those who had sex ed were more likely to say they'd use birth control, and strangely, were less likely to have sex at all. Back in my day teenage boys were pretty much determined to have sex no matter what, so I'm not sure what's up with the kids now, except those must be some sex ed classes.

But did abstinence-only sex ed make a difference? This study doesn't show that, it just focused on any type of sex ed. You know, if we really want to delay teens from getting down, we ought to have the parents sit down and offer graphic and informative descriptions of what sex entails. Because who wants to do something you first heard described by your mom? Then again, you can look to the source on this one, cuz I fail to get upset by the idea of teens having sex.