Now, according to a Swedish medical ruling, if a mother or
couple discover the gender of their baby and decide “that’s not what we were hoping
for” they can get an abortion on that basis.
Here’s how it broke down. A Swedish mother of two girls
requested two abortions in a row after learning the gender of her fetus. It
became apparent to doctors her decision to abort was based on the discovery of
gender, which obviously was not the one she was aiming for. Doctors at Mälaren
Hospital expressed concern and asked Sweden’s National Board of Health and
Welfare to draw up guidelines on how to handle requests in the future in which
they "feel pressured to examine the fetus’s gender" without having a
medically compelling reason to do so.
The board found such requests cannot be refused, and neither
can abortions, thus medical staff cannot refuse to perform an abortion based on
gender.
Now the idea of isolating a “gay” gene in fetuses and
therefore “eliminating” it has been bandied about by rather tacky political
pundits. But before we get to that moral maelstrom, pick-and-choose baby gender
is already here. Sure, the day when doctors can fudge your baby’s DNA to
increase the probability of a boy or girl is possibly coming sooner than later,
but for now, if you don’t like what you got, scrap it and start again.
Does this already happen discreetly in America? I can’t
imagine anyone would ever openly admit to their doctor or otherwise that they
want to abort the baby because “I really had my heart set on a girl” but that
doesn’t mean it isn’t happening. Do you think this is more common that people
are admitting?
More Stuff:
Disturbing Baby-Swinging PSA
Dumb Kiddy Product Makeovers
Eating Your Baby's Placenta