Strollerderby

Women Switched at Birth Find Out 56 Years Later

Posted by Brett Singer

These women were switched at birth in the hospital more than 50 years agoIn the Rolodex of Potential Parental Nightmares, having your baby switched with someone else's at the hospital is definitely in the top 10.

Now imagine that happening, but you don't find out until 56 years later.

From Fox News:

On a spring day in 1953, two baby girls were born at Pioneer Memorial Hospital in eastern Oregon. They grew up happily, got married, had kids of their own and became grandparents. Then last summer their lives were turned upside down.
Kay Rene Reed Qualls found out that she and DeeAnn Angell Shafer were switched at birth.

I mean, what the hell? Amazing story of course. But would you even want to know? Fox News says that "a woman who knew both their mothers called Qualls' brother with her suspicion" that the switch had occurred. So they went out and got a DNA test, and yep, the yenta was right.

After the test, Ms. Qualls said "I cried...I wanted to be a Reed — my life wasn't my life." 

But it is your life, isn't it? I've never been in this situation before, but it comes up a lot on television. For example, on "Gossip Girl" (stay with me here, and spoiler alert for anyone who hasn't seen the show and is planning to watch it on DVD) Rufus finds out that his ex-and-now-current lover had a baby that she gave up for adoption. It was his. So he becomes obsessed with finding the kid, insisting that the child needs to know "his true father." They eventually find the family that adopted him, and they lie to Rufus and tell him that the kid was killed in an accident. Why? Because they don't want this "fancy New York couple" to take their son away from them. WHY? Because they lost their biological son in an accident, the same one they told Rufus killed his biological child, whom they adopted and can't bear to lose. (It's a good show, I'm not describing it well. Trust me.)

I know the situations aren't the same, but it's the same general idea. Does it matter what's in your blood? The people who raised you are your parents, right? Or does it matter? I'm not passing judgment. (Unless you tell me "Gossip Girl" sucks and I'm too old to be watching it. OK, I'm a little too old for the show. But it doesn't suck.) This is one of those situations I've never been in so I don't know how I'd feel if I were.

Would you want to know your "real" family? Would it effect how you felt about the one you grew up with?

Source: Fox News

Read more:

Homebirthing Advocate's Baby Dies During Homebirth

Did This Woman Commit Suicide Because She Couldn't Breastfeed?

Moms Taking Drugs to Stop Lactation

Mom Puts 9 Year Old Girl On Craigs List For Revenge

Crocheted Doll Gives Birth

FEMA Coloring Book Features 9/11 Image

Boy Accidentally Shoots Self With Forgotten Gun

 


+ DIGG + STUMBLE

Comments

 

Sue said:

I think my curious side would want to know my bio family, but I'd always consider the family who raised me to be "real." Just like most adoptees do.

May 12, 2009 2:09 PM
 

Shana said:

Gossip Girl does kind of suck.

But onto important stuff.  I would want to know mainly for health reasons.  What if there is some genetic disorder I need to know about, I need a kidney?  There are so many reasons to know.  It would not make the people that raised you any less your family, but why wouldn't you want to know where you came from (unless your parents were free wheeling axe murders)?  Remember Flirting With Disaster?  That movie was great.

May 12, 2009 2:36 PM
 

Brett Singer said:

The thing that stayed with me about 'Flirting with Disaster' was the armpit licking. But now that you mention it I remember the adoption thing. Odd movie. The genetics angle is something I hadn't thought of. But what do you do once you're 56?

May 12, 2009 3:53 PM
 

leahsmom said:

I second Sue - and I am an adoptee.  The family I know, who raised and loved me is my real family.  I'd be curious to know about my biological relatives, for curiosity and for health reasons, but it wouldn't change how I feel one bit.  And to say "my life's not my life" because you find out your genes are different? I have a hard time sympathizing with that.

And I think it brings up a dark, misogynistic side to these things.  When people find out their dad is not their biological dad - i.e., mom cheated - they don't criticize their whole lives as false.  But when the mom isn't the biological mom - well, somehow that turns your whole life upside down? Again, I can't sympathize here.  

May 12, 2009 4:09 PM
 

Manjari said:

I second Brett - the thing that I remember about Flirting with Disaster is the armpit licking.

May 12, 2009 8:57 PM
 

Sheri said:

I'm agreeing with Leahsmom.  

I don't get it.

May 12, 2009 11:52 PM
 

MsC said:

I'd advise everyone with hearing to listen to the This American Life where they talk to the daughters and mothers involved in a switched-at-birth situation.  This situation is slightly different because one of the mothers knew all along, but I think listening to these people talk goes to show that it's not a simple thing to cope with.

www.thisamericanlife.org/Radio_Episode.aspx

May 13, 2009 2:01 PM

About Brett Singer

Brett Singer is a writer and father living in Manhattan with his wonderful wife and two terrific sons (referred to here as Thing 1 and Thing 2). He writes about music for the Boston Phoenix, parenting for Babble and daddytips.com, and other topics for anyone else who will have him.

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage