Strollerderby

Consumer Reports Responds to Sling-Hate Outrage

Posted by Madeline Holler

When Consumer Reports issued its warning against five products they thought should never find their way onto a baby registry, the response was one of outrage. Especially with regard to two issues: baby-wearing and co-sleeping.

The venerated watchdog group warned of serious injury and death from both, adding that co-sleeping products pose their own set of risks, but got hammered by co-sleeping baby-wearers. So in a follow-up post to all the angry comments, here's how they defended their findings.

On slings:

Slings can be very difficult for some people to tie, position and wear securely. Not all are intuitive and it’s easy for caregivers to get them wrong. If they do, the consequence can be dire. Many of the injuries associated with slings happen when the baby falls out of the carrier or bangs his head against a hard surface, say a door frame. There’s also a risk of positional asphyxia, which occurs when a baby is curled up in the sling and the head is pushed so far forward that the airway is closed off.

It may be possible to make sling carriers that don’t pose safety risks and that are not as easy to use incorrectly as many currently on the market. We’ll reserve our judgment until an adequate safety standard can be developed for these products.

And on co-sleeping:

... infants younger than eight months old who are placed to sleep in adult beds are as much as 40 times more likely to suffocate than if they are placed to sleep in cribs. Even when researchers provided a more conservative estimate by eliminating all deaths from parents physically overlying an infant and then doubled the estimated number of infants who may be put to sleep in adult beds, the risk of fatality from bed sharing was still 20 times greater than that of infants who sleep in cribs.

The short post (which was startlingly defensive, but OK) went on to recommend that parents put babies in a bare crib to sleep only. (Maybe I'm feelng a bit churlish, but I'd like to point out that the very next post is about the second-round of a massive crib recall).

As for carriers, they recommend only Baby Bjorn or Snugli style carriers. Which, as you can read in comments, just aren't right for people who prefer to sling.

More Posts

Sling Babies At Your Own Risk

Dangerous Baby Gear: Why Can I Buy It?

Consumer Reports Picks 5 Baby Gifts Never to Buy Again


+ DIGG + STUMBLE

Comments

 

gpgirl said:

These are warnings based on testing from Consumer Reports. They are not saying these products should be taken off the market. They tested the products and reported on the results. If they found these results and did not report on them, that would be a major ethical issue.

Each family can then make their own choice. For example, I gave my son toys that were meant for "3 years plus" when he was 2 because I felt he was ready for them. I did not write a letter of complaint to the toy company to say they shouldn't provide an age limit.

As for the crib recall, it is not like there were hundreds of kids who were injured, but even a few will result in a recall, as they should. (There were 31 incidents of slats breaking, and 2 incidents of children getting trapped, without major injury.) I know there have been at least a few babies who have fallen out of slings, but since slings are not regulated to the same extent as cribs, they weren't recalled.

May 1, 2009 4:45 PM
 

gpgirl said:

Also, I am curious as to what you found so startlingly defensive in CR's response. I thought it was pretty clear headed. I think the fact that people are using the term "sling-hate" is pretty defensive.

May 1, 2009 4:50 PM
 

ina said:

I remember reading an incredibly alarmist study on co-sleeping years ago (?) by a very respected mainstream source (JAMA?). A closer look revealed that the 'fatal' cases had parents who were unconscious (from drugs or alcohol) or morbidly obese & rolled onto their babies without noticing, or had a 5-gallon bucket full of water RIGHT NEXT TO the bed which the infant mysteriously fell into (my girlfriend said "THat's infanticide made to look like an accident") or so much garbage piled next to the bed that the baby suffocated in it when it fell off. Yeah, not scenarios I'm familiar with.

May 1, 2009 4:59 PM
 

Manjari said:

gpgirl, I agree with you 100%.

May 1, 2009 5:15 PM
 

feefifoto said:

My friend trained as an emergency neonatal pediatrician; he was the one in the flight suit on the helicopter conveying dangerously ill newborns to hospitals.  He told me that he had removed two asphyxiated infants from baby slings and he'd never use them.

May 1, 2009 6:29 PM
 

Alice said:

Most mother in third world countries dont use those slings.  They use back carriers or baskets on their backs or hip carriers for older babies.  Common sense.  Slings are big money in this country though with the stylish designs.  They are unsafe to an infant who cannot support their head.  You would never let your childs' head flop over while sleeping in a swing or carseat.  

I know of a couple here in my town who let their 7 month old sleep with them.  He died when he rolled to the end of the bed and got his face caught between the foot board and the mattress after his mother had gotten up to get ready for the day.  She did not roll over on him.  

May 1, 2009 9:56 PM
 

Baby Shower said:

Very nice.

May 2, 2009 10:28 AM
 

diera said:

I once took my young infant to an emergency room (he had pinkeye and we were traveling so I couldn't see his regular doctor) and was keeping him calm in the sling while we wated.  When we were called in to see the doctor, the nurse clipped an oxygen monitor to his toe, studied the readout, and said, "OK, take him out of there and we'll try this again."  I asked why, and she said, "Because if I write down this number I'm going to have to initiate measures to resuscitate him."  

That was the end of slings for me.

May 2, 2009 11:49 AM
 

Deni said:

What Alice says about co-sleeping is very valid. Parents who co-sleep need to subject their bed to the same rigours they would subject a crib to: No places for the baby to get hir head stuck!!!

Of course, most advocates of co-sleeping I remember from when my kids were infants clearly stated that head and foot-boards were a danger, and the bed should be low to the ground.

May 2, 2009 1:44 PM
 

Damion said:

These are the warning based onm the consumer reports.It is really appreciating for providing these details.But I do remember that when my daughter was infant clearly stated that head and foot-boards were a danger, and the bed should be low to the ground.

Damion

<a href="http://www.babyshowerinvitations101.com"> Baby Shower Invitations</a>

May 2, 2009 11:50 PM
 

carie said:

gpgirl - Well said. I agree with you completely

May 4, 2009 1:15 PM
 

Laurel said:

I don't recall anywhere in the CR article where they mentioned actual testing of the baby carriers!  That is the part that has many of us babywearing advocates frustrated- the CR article has a lot of opinions in it, but not much in the way of research.  Yes, positional asphyxia can occur in a sling (to which the poster whose baby had low oxygen in the sling can attest) if proper positioning technique is not used.  But when I did a google search on positional asphyxia, slings and carriers hardly came up at all - the massive majority of the cases of positional asphyxia were from car seats, infant swing/rockers and babies getting their heads caught in things (between crib and mattress, bed and wall, etc).  

It is vital, as with any baby item, to use a baby carrier correctly!  For that reason, you might want to check out this article, written by a nurse.  www.carrymeaway.com/.../Correct%20Positioning%5B1%5D.pdf

May 9, 2009 3:07 PM

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage