Strollerderby

UPDATE: Octomom Fires Angels in Waiting - The Drama Continues

Posted by SunnyChanel

 

Octomom did it again. She did something really crazy. What did she do this time? She fired the team of free nannies that she had partnered with. This week, Nadya Suleman canned the Angels in Waiting that were be attending to her brood free of charge. Her plan now is to hire her own nannies to care for the kids. I guess the whole being a media sensation is really paying off and she can now afford to pay for that kind of care.

The drama started when one of Suleman’s personally hired nannies called 911 to have Gloria Allred, the legal powerhouse who arranged the Angels in Waiting deal, to be removed from the house.  Then next thing you know, the whole gang is out of Octoland.  Suleman had “several confrontations with the nurses” and she felt they were spying on her and in turn reporting what they found to child welfare officials. Jeff Czech, her attorney said that  “Nadya felt that she was being judged wrongfully, and she didn't need it."

"Yes, it's true. I released AIW," Suleman said in a statement to Us Weekly. "It was really bad. That's all I can say. I can't confirm, why, in particular. I will be releasing the details soon." And Gloria Allred told US Magazine that "We have no comment at this time. We will respond tomorrow afternoon with the true facts."  When she says “tomorrow afternoon” she is referring to the taping of yet another Dr. Phil episode on Octomom being taped where Suleman, Allred and the Angels in Waiting will get into the ring for some on-air sparring.

If you were in her shoes would you say no to all that free and well-trained help?

UPDATE: 

Suleman told Dr. Phil about firing the Angels in Waiting, "The primary issue was that myself and my nannies felt extremely uncomfortable. I personally felt like a stranger in my own home. The goal was to empower me as a mother, help me, train me. I'm open to that, I want that, I want to do the very best for these...premature babies. I wanted [Angels] to use their training and knowledge to help guide me. I felt that was never accomplished. I felt as though every time I tried to hold the babies, feed the babies, they would be observing and they were waiting for me to make a mistake."

Perhaps that’s what drove Nadya, according to Gloria Allred, upstairs away from the babies? Allred told the Today Show, “How can she succeed if she is subjecting her babies to potential risks of harm? If she doesn’t even come into the nursery to feed her own babies, to hold them, to bathe them, to change them, to love them, to bond with them, except when the cameras are rolling?” She continued to say, “There’s only a few hours beyond the time when the cameras were rolling that she actually came into the nursery when she was there to care for her babies, and that’s wrong.”

Suleman’s assumptions that Angels in Waiting were observing and reporting on her to the authorities was not unfounded. Allred confirmed that Angels in Waiting has filed three separate complaints with child welfare officials. Suleman was also made uneasy by the head of Angels in Waiting, Linda Conforti, warning Suleman of child abduction and that Suleman felt “nauseous” after Conforti saying that one of the babies would fit into her purse and could be taken away. 

Allred and Angels in Waiting all agree that more security needs to arranged for the home and that it’s a “dangerous situation.” Allred said on the Today show that “Look, we need security here for these babies. Yet, instead of providing security, she puts in her own Jacuzzi instead of hiring security guards,”

I’m personally getting tired of all this drama. Aren’t you?
 

Source  and Source


+ DIGG + STUMBLE

Comments

 

purplehoneybee said:

the organization's goal is to put children into foster care. i wouldn't trust them or gloria allred.

March 24, 2009 6:54 PM
 

SingoMom said:

I don't think it's crazy at all to fire people whom you don't feel you can trust in your home or with your children.  While she may have done something I consider crazy by getting herself impregnated all those times, this latest move seems quite sane to me.  

What's really crazy is a site that presents itself as 'progressive' like Babble spewing such sensational B.S.  Enough fueling the mommy wars already!  Down with this blatant misogyny!  

March 24, 2009 8:52 PM
 

stcelia said:

Woohoo! Right on, SingoMom!

March 24, 2009 9:00 PM
 

Knitty said:

She'll be "releasing the details soon"?  But I thought all she wanted was her privacy?  Here's a tip, Octomom: people who value their privacy don't issue press releases about their personal parenting decisions.

March 24, 2009 9:43 PM
 

wow gold said:

As a mom, the care and safety of her kids should be the top priority. So firing those free and well-trained nannies was a NO NO.

March 24, 2009 9:58 PM
 

SIngoMom said:

perhaps you've never had to entrust a stranger with the care of your child, wow gold?  if not, let me assure you it's not as easy  as merely accepting any offer presented to you.   "well-trained" doesn't mean bupkis when it comes to trusting someone with you life and blood.  and free.... well.... nothing is free.

March 24, 2009 11:14 PM
 

Sam said:

"and free.... well.... nothing is free." no truer or sadder words will ever be written.

I don't know that I could ever entrust the care of my son to a stranger; and having them be forced upon me because of their own need for publicity would not go down very well either.

March 24, 2009 11:56 PM
 

Lex said:

I saw a few minutes of that video where she brought the first babies, and one of the nannies was clearly scolding her/talking down to her. In front of the cameras. As a professional nanny myself, there is no way in hell I would talk to my boss that way! This is someone else's child you're taking care of- if she can't trust you to respect her, how can she trust you to take care of her child?

March 25, 2009 9:09 AM
 

Alice said:

I guess she can go back to dancing topless to pay for the new nannies.

March 25, 2009 12:04 PM
 

maeby said:

did she really put in a jacuzzi?? How can that be safe with 14 kids around?

March 26, 2009 8:03 AM
 

Brittany said:

I dont think shes wrong for firing the nannies if she didnt feel that she trusted them. But i think that maybe they should take her kids away from her because i think she doesnt have the time to take full care of all 14 kids.

March 26, 2009 9:30 AM
 

Shannon LC Cate said:

That organization is all about taking kids from moms and placing them for adoption.  I'd never have let them in in the first place.  Good on her for firing them.

March 26, 2009 11:49 PM

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage