Strollerderby

Fox Asks, “Would You Want Terrorists Living in Your Backyard?”

In response to President Obama’s executive order to close Guantanamo, give the remaining detainees fair trials, and ban torture (you know, the kinds of basic civil liberties that have governed civilized societies since the Magna Carta), Fox News has responded with unprecedented fear mongering.

As you can see in the clip below, they sent a reporter to Pennsylvania, armed with photos of apparently Muslim men—some in turbans, some simply dark-skinned. They showed these photos to people on the street and asked, “Would you want terrorists living in your backyard?”

Let's quickly unpack a few blatant problems with this question. First, the vast majority of the remaining men at Guantanamo have been held for seven years with ever being charged with a crime. The Pentagon admits that only five percent of them were picked up on a battlefield, and has already cleared many of them for release. They are no more convicted terrorists than I am.

And who said anything about housing Guantanamo detainees in a backyard? If these men are brought to the U.S., they will be housed in maximum security prisons. America’s criminal justice system is the best in the world. Federal courts have convicted 145 people on international terrorism charges since 9/11—while Guantanamo’s military commissions have made all of TWO convictions.

Perhaps most egregious of Fox was to associate photos of random dark-skinned men with terrorists. Let’s remember that many men who look exactly like the people in these photographs are American citizens. Their kids attend school with the same kids who watched this outrageous segment on Fox.

Knowing that this level of irrational fear and hatred exists in millions of families in the U.S., those parents who do not watch Fox News have a special responsibility to teach their children tolerance and the courage to impart tolerance to their peers.

The best part of this clip is at the end, when the anchors all decide that the remaining Guantanamo detainees should be held at Alcatraz—you know, with all those West Coasters who hate America. Um, I hate to be a nitpicker, but Alcatraz is a theme park. Would you rather have suspected terrorists held at a theme park than at a maximum-security prison?

 

 

Photo: viralpolitics.com


+ DIGG + STUMBLE

Comments

 

Treespeed said:

Bush already released a buch Gitmo prisoners. If some of those prisoners weren't terrorists before their incarceration I bet they are now. Talk about instant living martyrdom.

February 9, 2009 1:55 PM
 

lovedannygansle said:

Senator Brownback has already made a stink about prisoners coming to Leavenworth (Federal prison located in Eastern Kansas).  I do not fear the safety of the citizens of Leavenworth since the Federal prisoners incarcerated there are likely far more dangerous and sociopathic than any Guantanamo detainees.  And further, what special skills do these native-Middle Easterners have to bust out of Leavenworth that hardened American criminals don't have?

February 9, 2009 3:06 PM
 

Amanda B. said:

The irony is that these prisoner would not be treated as well in an American federal prison as they are at Gitmo. Do you really think they'll be able to play soccer all the time and have special meals made for them like they do now? Do you think American criminals will play nice with them in the yard? I doubt it.

Gitmo was the perfect solution for these men who are neither criminals or prisoners of war as defined in the Geneva Conventions - they are stateless terrorists who declared war on us.

February 9, 2009 10:54 PM
 

Sheri said:

I read that one prisoner has already returned to his home country and has rejoined his terriorist buddies.  I wouldn't worry about the guys in prison busting out, I'd worry that some terrorist group would decide to try to get them out. To do that before, they would have to go to Cuba--also known as not here.  And now....

February 10, 2009 9:18 AM
 

Manjari said:

I hate Faux News.

February 10, 2009 9:24 AM
 

Hannah Tennant-Moore said:

Amanda B., I'm not sure where you got your information about how prisoners are treated at Guantanamo, but it is woefully inaccurate. If you don't believe me, perhaps you'll believe a former Guantanamo prosecutor who resigned in protest over the torture and unfair trials conducted at Gitmo (www.washingtonpost.com/.../AR2009011402319_pf.html).

This guy is no liberal. He headed to Guantanamo excited to bring justice to terrorists, and laughing off accounts of torture at Gitmo. Here's one excerpt of what he soon realized about Gitmo:

"We have kept human beings in solitary confinement for as long as seven years, even though they have never been charged with any crime. In other places, we have beaten hooded, shackled prisoners, at least two of whom died as a result.

There is a way out of Guantanamo. It is not as difficult as some apologists have made it seem. Many of the detainees have not committed war crimes and the handful of real terrorists and war criminals can be tried in federal court. The Department of Justice has a well-developed expertise in these cases and can achieve justice with transparency and rigorous due process."

February 10, 2009 1:04 PM
 

Twintown said:

Thank you, Hannah!  Answering fear with facts always shuts down these types of discussions - and you did it in such a nice, calm way:)

February 11, 2009 9:26 AM

About Hannah Tennant-Moore

Hannah Tennant-Moore is a Brooklyn-based freelance writer whose work has appeared or is forthcoming in Best Buddhist Writing (2008); The Sun; Guantanamo: Inside the Prison, Outside the Law; Tricycle; Turning Wheel (as the winner of the Young Writers Award); and elsewhere.

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage