Strollerderby

Lutheran High School Can Expel Lesbians—And Does

Posted by Miriam Axel-Lute

A California appeals court has upheld the right of a private Lutheran high school to expel students based on sexual orientation. Creepy as that sounds, I don't think the court is actually wrong. As long as they don't take one single of penny of my taxpayer money, religious organizations have the freedom to be petty, mean, and discriminatory in their own special ways all day long. 

(For clarification: This is a school run by the "Wisconsin Synod" Lutherans, not Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, which is more tolerant.)

The school itself, on the other hand, which ended up in court because it did in fact expel two female students for having a relationship with each other, is wrong in so many ways.

I really can't say the main point much better than Shaun Martin over at California Appellate Report, who writes: "I know that if I taught at a private high school . . . I'd definitely spend my valuable time looking up the myspace pages of all the female students in my class to see if any of them said that they were bisexual or in love with another female student. Yes, and if I were the principal of said high school, and a teacher discovered that two female students had in fact so identified themselves, I'd definitely call them into my office and interrogate them about whether they had a consensual lesbian relationship. . ."

Not to mention the crazy power this gives mean, rumor-mongering teens.

And would the snooping stop with teenagers? If religious schools think they have license to control not only what happens in school, but the private lives of their communities, are parents of young kids in religious elementary schools going to find their kids expelled when it becomes clear that they aren't using birth control (not enough kids! need more tuition!) or don't attend church enough? I know in some dioceses unmarried Catholic school teachers have actually had problems with priestly peeping Toms trying to see whether they are having overnight guests.

According to the AP, the school's lawyer says the school's goal is to "educate based on Christian principles." I realize the world is full of examples to the contrary, but it's always been my understanding that the core Christian principles are supposed to be forgiveness and redemption. Oh well.

I guess the girls who were expelled will have a good chance to practice forgiveness, but I'm guessing there are more and more parents out there who are going to just opt out of schools like this in the first place.

Photo by Made Underground.

More by this author:


+ DIGG + STUMBLE

Comments

 

Kate said:

I went to a school like this as a kid, and ended up at a Christian college in Texas, and their policy was to expel or fire anyone associated with the school who was even suspected of homosexuality. When a group of protesters came on campus to raise awareness about this incredibly unjust policy, the school had them all arrested! My husband and I were both on full scholarships, but we chose community college over that kind of un-Christian nonsense. Honestly, sometimes I wish I weren't even associated with the Christian church in this country. Jesus would be ashamed of us.

January 28, 2009 7:57 PM
 

Alice said:

It is their club they can have the members they want. I attended a high school that would expel you if you got caught screwing anyone.  That made sense to me.  Underage kids have no business having sex with anybody.  

January 28, 2009 8:12 PM
 

Umbersontonson said:

Whether the policy of the school is right or wrong is of no consequence.  The fact of the matter is: Private individuals/groups should and do have the right to set their own admissions standards.  This is not wrong, this is right (not the policy, but the idea behind it).  Infringing upon the rights of an institution to set its own criterion on admissions policies is a form of discrimination as well.  These girls could go to 99% of schools...just not that one.

January 28, 2009 11:26 PM
 

RJ said:

Several passages in the Bible speak against homosexuality. Several others speak about greed and respect for the temple (church) One of Jesus's fameous displays of anger was when the people turned the Temple into a marketplace and he turned over tables of goods being sold. He was  not "forgiving" in that incident. Is all peoples perception of Jesus is he took a bunch of crap and jsut stood around forgiving sins without preaching against it? I am sure he would get just as angry at having sins condoned at a religeous school as he was at a temple.

January 29, 2009 9:17 AM
 

C Hamre said:

I went to this very school back in the 80's.  While it was forbidden to have public displays of affection on campus between heterosexuals or homosexuals, it still happened, those people just didn't get caught.   One student, however, was expelled for getting pregnant back in 1980 or 1981.  

It would be interesting to know if the principal actually caught them  doing something on campus, if not then they really shouldn't be expelled.  Their private lives are their business.  I have read also that though he didn't see anything, he thought their relationship could possible lead to something inappropriate.  Now, if that is the case, they should also forbid dating at that high school because that could lead to premarital sex, which is also against Christian principles.

January 29, 2009 9:31 AM
 

RJ Said it said:

First I would like to say to the article writer- I don't tihnk these girls were seeking forgiveness and redemption.

I am reminded of Jude 14:4 They are godless men who change the grace of our God into a license for immorality and deny Jesus Christ our only Sovereign and Lord.

Jesus' sacrifice does not give us a license to commit acts clearly defined by the bible as sin. We all have the freedom of choice, but do not think you can make bad choices and escape consequence.

Not to mention, they knew the rules going into the school. If you can't abide, don't reside.

RJ is absolutely correct.

Liberals are always screaming about separation of church and state...SO SEPARATE.

January 29, 2009 9:40 AM
 

Miriam Axel-Lute said:

Alice: To the best of my knowledge what they know is only that they kissed. Good luck keeping all underage kids from doing that.

RJ: If you think forgiveness is wimpy, you may not have ever tried it. It doesn't mean not get angry first either. Also, the bible never mentions female homosexuality and puts male homosexuality at the same level as wearing flax and cotton mixed. But, as I said, believe what you want as long as you don't use my taxpayer dollars to enforce it.

C Hamre: I think the double standard point is definitely part of this, as is the snooping. Apparently drug and alcohol abuse have been treated more lightly, along with het dating.

Umberstonston: As you will see, I agree with you that court's decision was right. However, in terms of where the girls can go to school, (1) very few people know their sexual orientation before they enter high school (2) if they do, how many are going to tell their parents as a reason they don't want to go to an anti-gay Christian school?

January 29, 2009 9:40 AM
 

Miriam Axel-Lute said:

RJ Said It: I believe in separation of church and state, as I said clearly at the beginning. I don't think this court decision should have gone differently.

That doesn't, however, mean that I'm not allowed to criticize churches even as I support their rights to follow their beliefs.

January 29, 2009 9:42 AM
 

DCMama said:

Sheesh.  For the sake of open-minded Lutherans everywhere can you clarify that this is "Wisconsin Synod" Lutheran, not Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA) Lutheran.  ELCA is the "Thrivant Fincancial for Lutherans" and Garrison Keilor Lutherans you find on public radio.  Wisconsin Synod is a different story. We ELCA Lutherans are not kicking anyone out of school or church.

January 29, 2009 10:21 AM
 

Miriam Axel-Lute said:

DCMama: Good point. Done.

January 29, 2009 10:55 AM
 

C Hamre said:

To DC Mama:  I went to this school and it is Wisconsin Synod

January 29, 2009 1:11 PM
 

Jane said:

Um, ELCA are not exactly paragons of openness. As far as I know, they still don't ordain openly gay and lesbian folks. Some like Rev. Anita Hill have been ordained through the "Extraordinary Candidacy Project," but at great personal and emotional cost. (There's a movie about it.) So, yeah, Wisconsin Synod is more aggressively anti-gay, but ELCA puts a more welcoming face over policies that sometimes aren't all that different.

January 29, 2009 3:18 PM
 

Treespeed said:

I'm fine with no lesbians in the religious schools, now can we get the spirit worshippers to stop trying to put prayer and creationism in our schools. That would be great.

January 29, 2009 3:44 PM
 

Laura said:

"Christian principles" call not only for "redemption and forgiveness", but also for repentance (confession AND change) from sin.

January 29, 2009 4:07 PM
 

Jeff said:

I agree with RJ.  Many misinterpret what Christian love is all about.  Yes, Jesus loves everyone.  That's why he was willing to die for all of humanity.  That doesn't mean he accepts all behavior.  Somehow we all like to conveniently overlook what he told the woman caught in adultery.  He had told the Pharisees ready to stone her, "Whoever is without sin, cast the first stone."  At that, they all dispersed.  He then asked her, "Has no one condemned you?"  "No one, sir," she replied.  "Then neither do I," said Jesus.  "Go now and leave your life of sin."  

January 29, 2009 4:30 PM
 

Manjari said:

I'm with Treespeed!

January 29, 2009 5:43 PM
 

Miriam Axel-Lute said:

Jeff (and anyone else!): Question--Does expelling high school students seem more like saying "I don't condemn you; leave your life of sin" or more like stoning?

January 30, 2009 9:05 AM
 

JeanneSager said:

"If religious schools think they have license to control not only what happens in school, but the private lives of their communities, are parents of young kids in religious elementary schools going to find their kids expelled when it becomes clear that they aren't using birth control (not enough kids! need more tuition!) or don't attend church enough?"

Yes! My friend was kicked out of Baptist school because his parents attended an Assembly of God church - that was considered not the right church, so he was expelled.

January 30, 2009 10:27 AM
 

Tracie Lee said:

How is it unjust, mean and discriminatory for a religious private school to expel students for not upholding the tenets of christianity which expressly says that homosexuality is wrong? Granted, all people sin and fall short of the glory of God, but telling a lie goes a lot deeper than making life choices that offend God.

January 30, 2009 11:41 AM
 

Miriam Axel-Lute said:

Tracie Lee: I missed who was lying? Seems like the girls were fairly open and honest about it or this wouldn't have been an issue.

And, though I'm interested in the meta discussion too, it's worth noting that I (and plenty of other people) dispute the idea that opposition to homosexuality at the level it is prioritized in our current society is Biblically justified. Not that I expect to win that argument with people convinced otherwise.

January 30, 2009 11:55 AM
 

C Hamre said:

There should be just as strong of an opposition by the church to premarital sex and extramarital sex, as there is homosexuality.  All are wicked in God's eyes.

January 30, 2009 12:27 PM

About Miriam Axel-Lute

Miriam Axel-Lute is a freelance writer, editor, poet, and urban planning junkie. She lives, works, and gardens in Albany, NY, with her two partners and daughter.

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage