Strollerderby

Is It Ethical for Scientists to Use Their Kids as Test Subjects?

Here’s a reason for wanting a baby that you don’t hear everyday: “I really want to study him and do experiments with him.” This was the thinking of Dr. Sinha, an MIT neuroscience professor, upon the birth of his son.

According to the New York Times, Dr. Sinha is just one of many scientists using their kids as test subjects in large part because “children make reliable participants in an era of scarce research financing.” Is this creepy or just practical?

Numerous kids of scientists have been instrumental in research on everything from brain scans to the effects of media on children. In an extreme example, scientist Deb Roy recorded nearly 70 percent of his son’s waking hours for the first three years of his life in order to study language development.

Many scientists argue that using their own children as subjects proves the safety of the experiments: why would they put their own kids, whom they love above all else, at risk? Furthemore, review boards establish rules for safe experimentation, including a prohibition on videotaping toilet training, which could prove embarrassing later.

I understand this argument, and don't doubt that well-meaning scientists would never willingly put their children at risk. However, I do question the ways experimenting on children can affect parent-child relationships. So does Robert M. Nelson, the director of the Center for Research Integrity at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia. “The role of the parent is to protect the child,” he said. “Once that parent becomes an investigator, it sets up an immediate potential conflict of interest.”

Like most parenting issues, this question defies a black-and-white answer. Some grown children of scientists look back on their time as test subjects as a fun way to bond with their parents, while others remember the experiments as stressful, colored by an uncomfortable need to please their parents.

Do you think there’s a surefire way to predict whether experiments with children will be harmless or harmful? If not, is it wrong for scientists to use their children in the service of scientific inquiry?

Photo: New York Times

Related Post: Video: Doing Science Experiments on Your Kids


+ DIGG + STUMBLE

Comments

 

Knitty said:

Isn't all parenting basically a big experiment?  You form a theory about what will work and work best, you try it out, you look at the results, and based on your results you either continue what you're doing or your come up with a new theory and start the process over again.

If nothing else, these scientists are paying very close attention to their children, and I don't see how that can be a bad thing.  

January 20, 2009 5:48 PM
 

Laure68 said:

I agree with Knitty. I had no idea what I was doing when I had my son, it was one big experiment. For some reason, because scientists with advanced degrees do it, it creeps people out. When someone with no clue does it, it is parenting.

As a side note, let's hope that science becomes respected again in the new administration!

January 20, 2009 7:22 PM
 

Renee said:

I'm a developmental psychologist (I study children's cognitive & motor development), and I've brought many children of colleagues and friends to participate in research over the years.  I also brought in my own son, but of the 150 or so kids in this particular study, he was the only one who wouldn't complete a single trial - a curse of knowing the experimenter too well!  He knew all the cool toys were in the next room, and Mom's "game" just wasn't all that interesting in comparison.  I didn't stress over his nonparticipation any more than I do when another toddler just doesn't feel like doing it.

Any researcher who works with children is already incredibly sensitive to issues of conflict of interest and participant protection - we're trained to be overcautious. Furthermore, as the article says, all research involving human participants is carefully scrutinized by Institutional Review Boards.  You're simply not allowed to do anything that is in any sense coercive or poses risk of harm to children, whether they're your children or someone else's.

January 21, 2009 2:00 PM

About Hannah Tennant-Moore

Hannah Tennant-Moore is a Brooklyn-based freelance writer whose work has appeared or is forthcoming in Best Buddhist Writing (2008); The Sun; Guantanamo: Inside the Prison, Outside the Law; Tricycle; Turning Wheel (as the winner of the Young Writers Award); and elsewhere.

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage