Strollerderby

They Say: Parents Who Use Forward-Facing Strollers Treat Their Kids Like “Accessories”

The New Zealand publication Stuff has its panties all in a bunch over forward-facing strollers, seeing them as nothing more than the latest torture device for innocent youngsters everywhere.

Remember the recent study that found that babies who are walked in forward-facing strollers could be “emotionally impoverished” because they are denied facial contact with their parents, and are forced instead to familiarize themselves with, uh, the rest of the world? Well, Karl du Fresne has covered the study under the headline “Babies Paraded as Parents’ Fashion Accessories.” I’m not sure what kind of childhood this du Fresne character had, but he seems to think that parents are universally, egregiously selfish and vain, and the forward-facing stroller is just one more example of this mass parenting travesty.

Du Fresne sees it as “no surprise” that being “propelled toward a procession of bewildering, and possibly frightening, strangers” would impair children’s development. And naturally, the only possible reason he can imagine for such horrific parenting is—fashion.  He feels that parents everywhere see their children as nothing more than “a fashion accessory to be shown off for maximum advantage. This is accomplished far more effectively when the unfortunate infant is facing forward.”

Take that, forward-facing stroller users! I’ll bet you force your kids to wear diapers with those cutesy animal prints on them, too, you sickos.

Photo: Little Baby Guide

Related Post:

They Say: Forward-Facing Strollers Are Bad for Baby


+ DIGG + STUMBLE

Comments

 

Knitty said:

My daughter LOVES seeing the world from inside her stroller -- she babbles and chatters and giggles the whole time.  A laughing, happy baby... the face of child abuse.  PLEASE.

Exactly how much time does this dumbass suppose the average child spends in his/her stroller?  My little one was in hers maybe twenty minutes a day during nice weather, certainly not enough time to "impair" anything even if this "study" was anything but complete BS.  

December 8, 2008 7:12 PM
 

Issa said:

So according to Motrin, wearing our babies in the sling is a fad. Now putting them in the stroller is showing them off as fashion accessories. Where exactly do "they" suggest I should put 14.3 pound two and half month old? I can't carry him all day and I doubt they want me to ever set him down either.

Somehow I get the sense that people who write these ads/ do these studies have never been around a baby in their lives. I'm not even sure they were one themselves.

December 8, 2008 8:14 PM
 

Kae said:

Whoa, dumbass is right. If forward facing strollers were so horrible then wouldn't our children be  screaming their faces off or sitting in a blind stupor? Please.

Besides, I think my kid appreciates a break from looking at my face!

December 8, 2008 9:19 PM
 

gpgirl said:

Kae, I am with you. My son looks at my face all day long. I'm sure he can use a break once in a while.

Who is this guy anyway? I saw his post, but there was no bio. I also wonder if he has any children, or has taken care of any himself.

December 8, 2008 9:31 PM
 

feefifoto said:

Please excuse my euphemistic language, but ... THIS IS COMPLETE |3U|_|_5H!T!!  Don't these researchers have anything more important to worry about?

December 8, 2008 9:35 PM
 

jayelle said:

So... if forward facing stollers are fashion accessories, why is it that they cost $100, where the fancy rear-facing Quinny and Bugaboo cost $1000?

December 8, 2008 11:27 PM
 

Knitty said:

Bahahaha, good point Jayelle!  I think I see the root cause of the front-facing stroller "crisis."  And I totally agree, Kae.  Especially as a newborn, my girl was stuck looking at my face (or a boob) for most of the day.  I'm pretty sure she was grateful to get some new scenery.  

December 9, 2008 12:00 AM
 

JeanneSager said:

Even worse, Hannah, we had Sesame Street characters on our daughter's diapers. Emotionally impoverished AND commercialized!

December 9, 2008 11:34 AM
 

Alice said:

Just silly.  Next they will want us to shove them back into our wombs where they will be "safe".  

December 9, 2008 12:04 PM
 

gpgirl said:

You know, you really cannot win on this one. When my son was very small, we just used that frame that you pop the car seat in. It happens to face backwards, but the only reason I used this is because of the convenience. (Being able to move the baby from home to car to stroller without disturbing his sleep!) When he was about 6 months old, I started getting some comments (from strangers of course) that he really should be in a regular, front-facing stroller by now.

Parents really are criticized no matter what we do. Why does our society does this is the big question, as far as I am concerned.

December 9, 2008 12:43 PM
 

Knitty said:

gpgirl -- I suggest the book "Huck's Raft", which does an excellent of job explaining why people are (and always have been) so critical of parents.  And it's just a fascinating, well-researched and well-written book.

December 9, 2008 3:16 PM

About Hannah Tennant-Moore

Hannah Tennant-Moore is a Brooklyn-based freelance writer whose work has appeared or is forthcoming in Best Buddhist Writing (2008); The Sun; Guantanamo: Inside the Prison, Outside the Law; Tricycle; Turning Wheel (as the winner of the Young Writers Award); and elsewhere.

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage