Strollerderby

'Expert' Exhorts You to Hurry Up and Have Kids Already

Posted by Amy Kuras

 Would-be parents! Have you had the temerity to get an education, work on your career, and develop and refine your relationship with a partner before getting down to baby-havin’? Maybe the tanking economy is changing your plans?

Then you, my friends, are responsible for six “dominoes” that lead to terrible, if vague, societal costs according to a press release from Dr. Alan Singer. His take is that delaying childbirth is BAD and will mean BAD THINGS and some people might not get to be GRANDPARENTS if you don’t start pushing out heirs RIGHT. NOW!

If I just channeled your mother there, I’m sorry. On many levels.

Singer is a self-styled “family size expert” who writes a blog mostly devoted to exhorting people to not delay childbearing, no matter what. The dominoes he refers to are thus: delayed marriage, delayed childbearing, augmented infertility, elevated multiple births, increased rates of pre-term births and caesarian sections.

His main piece of advice is that parents should “encourage” their adult children to get themselves good and knocked up, even going so far as to suggest they offer financial support to talk them into doing so. Not surprisingly, he also thinks helicopter parenting is A-OK.

 Okay, I can acknowledge he has a bit of a point – it is a good idea to start sooner rather than later, if your life works out that way. But what Singer and others like him don't get is that for many of us, life just doesn’t. I didn’t marry until I was 30, which put me right about in the middle of my circle of friends age-wise. Not to mention that the two leading causes of female infertility, endometriosis and polycystic ovarian syndrome, or PCOS, are not age linked. I have PCOS and would have been just as infertile at 21 as I was at 31 – and personally, I would have been a considerably worse mother.

And if my parents had dared to start rattling the grandchildren cage? Would NOT have been pretty.




+ DIGG + STUMBLE

Comments

 

gpgirl said:

I seriously wasn't ready until my 30's to have kids. If I had kids in my 20's, I would have been a terrible mother, and very resentful. When I finally did have a baby, I had already done a ton in my life and had a great career. (Not to mention the financial means to be comfortable supporting a child and to be able to stay home with him. Now I know that you really don't need that much money to have a kid, but it made it so much easier for us.)

Also, I think I was even too immature to get married in my 20's. I think there are some people who are just ready earlier.

I know the big drawback is the loss of fertility, but I always told myself I would adopt if I couldn't have a biological child, and I married a man who was OK with that.

December 5, 2008 12:20 PM
 

Brett Singer said:

I'm going to become an expert that tells people not to have children EVER.

December 5, 2008 12:56 PM
 

Shannon said:

Wait, the terrible end of the domino chain is an increased rate of c-sections?  When did that become the worst thing ever?  

December 5, 2008 2:50 PM
 

Knitty said:

My parents nagging me to hurry up and give them grandbabies already almost certainly contributed to our decision not to have our first until I was in my thirties.  If they would have attempted to BRIBE me into reproducing, it's possible they never would have had a grandchild.  That's just utterly obnoxious.

December 5, 2008 11:43 PM
 

Sara said:

No one reach through the computer and kill me but I do think this doc has a small point. The bottom line is that pregnancy is easier on your body the younger you are. You are less likely to have complications, including those that end in c-section (which is major surgery with all of it's risks and can have adverse effects later in life). If you do have any natural fertility problems it's still much easier to correct them in a 28 year old rather then a 38 year old. If nothing else, you have way more time on your side and don't have to start out as aggressively lessening the side effects for you and baby. As any fertility doc which age he'd rather work with.  

Now is this an argument for having a baby at 21, hell no. Is it one thing to consider if you're in your mid to late 20s and know for a fact you want to have kids. Yes. It's important to know the full consequeses of decisions you are making, especially putting off childbearing (and that's true for both genders BTW. Men have their own age linked fertility issues). You may still decide that waiting is far and away the way to go, but you should know the risk, both for you and your child.

Women are not baby factories and to imply such from anyone is so offensive, but biology does matter at least some what. It's a factor along with luck, maturity and a bunch of other stuff. And, if it really doesn't work for you, give Dr. so and so the finger and do what makes you happy. Just don't wake up at 40 and realise that the career is going nowhere and the baby of your dreams is going to cost $50k to create.

December 9, 2008 1:31 PM

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage