Strollerderby

New Jersey Lays Down the Law: Vaccinate All Kids Against the Flu

Posted by JeanneSager

I should probably preface this with a bit of a disclaimer: I'm a pro-vaccine parent, particularly the flu shot. But I still think the ultimate choice for vaccinating my child should rest with me. Which is why I'm glad I live an hour outside of New Jersey.

Parents were storming the statehouse in Trenton this week, protesting a new law that mandates children between the ages of 6 months and 5 years be vaccinated against the flu. Mandated. As in, made law.

It's the first law of its kind in the country - although plenty of other states have rules regarding medical interventions and our kids. I had no reason to protest the Vitamin K shot administered when my daughter was born, but then again, I wouldn't have been able to. I live in New York, one of a number of states that requires babies be given the injection right in the hospital, shortly after birth.

New Jersey's new law, which technically states children (under 5 and over 6 months) who attend daycare or preschool need to be vaccinated against the flu and pneumonia by Dec. 31, comes as we enter the first flu season for which the CDC has advocated all children (not just those under 5) be vaccinated. Advocated. Not mandated.

The flu shot has a lot going for it, don't get me wrong. The flu sends 200,000 Americans to the hospital every year, 20,000 of them children under 5. It kills 36,000 Americans, including people who die from a secondary illness due to an immune system weakened by the flu. It's a disease that spreads easily and can hit anyone. It's a shot I'm going to get, my husband is going to get and our daughter is going to get.

But I've seen nothing in all the news reports - even those that have come out in support of the new mandate - to explain how parents are supposed to pay for this. And I'm still leery of letting the step in at surface level to tell us how to parent. When a child is in clear danger, yes. When a child might or might not get a disease that might or might not make them seriously ill and might or might not be avoided by a shot, I wouldn't call it a clear and present danger. Are parents who don't get the shot playing with fire? Personally, yes, I think so. But I don't think there's enough evidence to show that the state stepping in on this one will make a difference in a child's life.

Image: Health News-Stat

Related Posts:

They Say: Get Your Kid the Flu Shot

We Know Some Toys are Infectious, but This Will Put a Pox on You

Party with the Pox, but Don't Say We Didn't Warn You

The Flu Shot: Do You Dare Not to Get It?

Keep Kids From Getting Fat - Get a Dog

Students Suspended for Hair Dyed Pink in Honor of School Nurse's Battle with Breast Cancer


+ DIGG + STUMBLE

Comments

 

Lisa said:

Sigh.  You claim that the law requires all children between 6 months and 5 years to be vaccinated is contradicted by the source which says if they attend daycare or preschool.   Clearly that is not all children and parents still have choices.  They can have a parent stay home OR they can have a nanny in the home.

And yes, children in daycare and preschool SHOULD be vaccinated.

October 18, 2008 5:51 PM
 

Ilana said:

I was one of those parents in Trenton on Thursday, and I'd like to clarify the reason we were there.  It was in SUPPORT of a bill that is on the table in the NJ legislature that would allow for a philosophical exemption to mandatory vaccination.  The same group of parents certainly does oppose Gov. Corzine's recent legislation to add a number of new vaccines to the mandatory list, inlcuding the flu vaccine, but that deal is done, and reversing it would be difficult right now.  So, yes, we are seeking the choice, as parents, to do what we know is right for our children.

I am also a parent who vaccinates, but only partially.  I am not against the idea of vaccination, but I am against the quantity of vaccines our children are receiving, the dangers associated with various toxins in the vaccines, and the lack of research that has been allowed to pass as medical science (vaccines are not subject to double-blind studies or long-term studies prior to FDA approval).  Particularly, the lack of research is a serious concern since NJ is both the state with the highest number of mandatory vaccines and the highest number of autism cases.  Not coincidentally, we are also the pharmaceutical capital of the country, if not the world.  

The flu vaccine is one that I avoid like the plague.  The chance of catching the flu is not as great as you describe (I myself have never had it in my 35 years, and I attended NYC schools and rode the subways regularly).  I'd be more concerned about tubureculosis, frankly (to which I have been exposed).  Complications from the flew, while they reach into the thousands, are statistically rare, and almost entirely concentrated among the elderly, newborn infants (for the whom the vaccine is ineffective and not given) and others with compromised immune systems.  Children and adults with healthy immune systems have almost nothing to worry about, even if they do get the flu.

The flu vaccine is fairly regularly ineffective, as the drug companies frequently produce vaccines against the wrong strains of the virus.  An educated guess is the best they have to determine what strain will be dominant in the coming season.  I don't see why it is so imperrative to guard against a guess that will likely do no harm anyway.

Finally, the flu shot is the last remaining vaccine to contain a full dose of mercury, a known toxin that is linked to Alzheimers and a variety of sensory disorders.  While there are flu shots manufactured without mercury, or with trace amounts, these are a tiny minority and are not available for all who would get the shot, not even all children.

I see no reason to risk a person's life or health with this very risky shot to protect against a virus that is in most cases benign.  And so, yes, we should all have choices about how we approach our own health and the health of our children.  It is bizarre and frankly un-American to restrict those choices.

October 18, 2008 8:21 PM
 

chyna823 said:

"Are parents who don't get the shot playing with fire? Personally, yes, I think so."

Playing with fire? Come on. Yes, some people can end up in the hospital because of the flu, but that's rare. And if the law stated that I had to give my children a vaccination that they really don't need, I'd be going to court. In general, I'm pro-vacc, but it's getting to the point where we're vaccinating children against illnesses that aren't all that terrible.

On top of that: The women in my family don't get the flu. We don't know why, but my grandmother, my mother, my sister, and I have never in all our years had the flu--even when our spouses had it, we never caught it. So I'm not going to mess with nature and get vaccinated for an illness I probably will never get, and by that token, I'm not doing it to my daughters, either.

October 18, 2008 9:21 PM
 

Downtown.mom said:

What I find really interesting is how Americans are so focused on the fact that they are the land of the FREE, but there is hardly ever any hesitation to take these freedoms away. Mandatory flu shots? Thats just another step down the road to having no choices at all.

The flu is not that bad especially compared to other contagions that have vaccinations so to have your choices limited or completely revoked is very disturbing to me.

Parents should be educated on their options and allowed to choose what they think is best. Not have their decisions made for them by the government. Hello 1984.

October 19, 2008 1:36 PM
 

Jesika said:

The Flu vaccine is far more dangerous than the illness itself (unless you are immunocompromised, and just because a 6 mos olds' immune system is not fully developed does not mean they are compromised!). Do some hardcore research. Let the body fight off what it needs to naturally. And if parents who chose to vaccinate are so confident in their vaccines then it should not bother or scare them that other parents don't vaccinate.

And yes, We DO live in AMERICA and we SHOULD have the right to CHOOSE!!!

October 19, 2008 11:07 PM
 

Nikole said:

I too was at the rally fighting for the choice as a parent to decide what goes into my child.

I choose not to put what I believe are toxic chemicals into my child.

Death from the flu is rare, death from the flu vaccine also rare....why chose equal outcomes and toxins?

October 21, 2008 4:49 PM
 

MICHELLE said:

WHERE DO WE DRAW THE LINE HERE >?? They are my kids.. I gave birth to them .. I woke up many hours durning the night . I fed them and bathe them .. Does the state of NJ do that ?? They are my kids !!! NOT THE STATE !!!! ITS MY CHOICE !! IF I WANTED TO LIVE IN A COUNTRY THAT RAN MY LIFE AND MY KIDS I'D MOVE TO RUSSIA !!!

November 14, 2008 10:43 AM

About JeanneSager

Jeanne Sager is a writer who lives in upstate New York with her husband, daughter, a dog and too many cats. She refuses to believe motherhood comes with pumpkin appliqued sweaters, and she';s not ready to apologize for having only one child. She writes about raising her kid in her own hometown and the mom stuff she's not embarrassed to own at her blog, Inside Out (http://jeannesager.blogspot.com), she's contributing editor of Grand Magazine, and she's a regular essayist here on Babble

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage