Babble

a magazine and community for the new urban parent

Strollerderby

Trans Community Worries About “Pregnant Man” Bad Press

When Oprah gets involved, people get famous. And in the case of transgender man Thomas Beattie, the results of this fame are, so far, neither fortune nor glory. Since Beattie first wrote about his unorthodox decision to stop taking testosterone and become pregnant because his wife is unable to carry a child, the media has (unsurprisingly) had a field day with what quickly became dubbed the “pregnant man” story.  The Oprah Winfrey Show, the BBC, Good Morning America, and People are only a few of the mainstream outlets to cover Beattie's pregnancy. 

According to an update from The Advocate—the LGBT magazine that broke Beattie’s story—not everyone in the transgender community is pleased with Beattie’s decision to go public. This shouldn’t come as a surprise to Beattie, who said that he contacted several transgender organizations before writing a first-person account of his decision to carry a child in The Advocate. Half of the organizations never responded, and most of the others urged him to stay out of the limelight, worrying that publicity would only harm the Beattie family and the transgender community at large.

Specifically, many trans activists worry that Beattie’s unusual story will cause an already less than tolerant public to label all transgender people “freaks” and “disgusting,” two terms that flooded the blogosphere in the wake of Beattie’s story. (The comments on my first article about Beattie’s pregnancy are a case in point.) Even more concerning are fears that this media frenzy could be used to fuel legislation curbing transgender rights, just as many states passed anti-gay marriage legislation after the Massachusetts supreme court upheld gays’ right to marry.

On the other hand, some LGBT activists applaud Beattie’s decision to stretch the limits of the public’s tolerance. As Beattie wrote in the Advocate—and Oprah quoted to a supportive studio audience—“[O]ur situation ultimately will ask everyone to embrace the gamut of human possibility and to define for themselves what is normal.”

While I am supportive of Beattie’s optimism that his story will open the public’s eyes to the many forms a healthy, loving family can take, I fear that this shift in perspective is unlikely to happen fast enough to shield his child from discrimination throughout his or her youth. With many bloggers expressing not only disgust but violent hatred for Beattie and his unborn child, I’m afraid we’ve got a long way to go.

Photo: ABC News 


Comments

 

JaySaint said:

I admit to feeling a little spun by the "pregnant man" story. It's got a kind of bizarre attraction.

I saw the Oprah show and I'm terribly concerned for the safety of that family. They struck me as a little bit naive about the implications of their revelations. I would not be surprised to hear that they had become the victims of hate crimes.

I'm not saying they shouldn't have come out. I think that's entirely their call. But I worry for their security and I hope that's been taken into consideration.

May 6, 2008 1:28 AM
 

Daisy Duck said:

I see this as a very positive, very loving, very moral situation. And I think Thomas is amazing to have made a decision to undergo gender reassignment (which is a huge, difficult decision and one requiring a lot of thought) but to then be willing to take a temporary step backwards to bring a child into their family. Psychologically, this has to be a real challenge and I admire him for being willing to do it. I'm pregnant at the moment and Thomas and I seem to be at roughly the same stage, so I'm identifying a lot (despite being a heterosexual female).

The comments from the previous article, which I missed, seem mixed, but I think it's interesting how many of them were from self-identified Christians who expect others (whether Christian or not) to live up to their idea of morality. If I were attacking Oprah, or Thomas, or 'lidia' for not being a good Wiccan or Zoroastrian or Taoist, that would only make sense if they were members of that religion. Trying to make an entire, varied society live up to the tenets of a particular religion, just because that's your religion, doesn't really make sense to me.

I hope things go very well for this family and that they bring inspiration to others in similar situations.

May 6, 2008 8:48 AM
 

Manjari said:

I just read the comments on your first article about this. I can't believe how many people said such ugly things. This is why I have such a problem with religious zealots. Those people (who wrote the mean comments) talk about God so much, but they are the members of society filled with the most hatred. Is that what they are getting out of religion? Hate thy neighbor?

I also don't understand why people care so much about what anyone else does. If you think the couple is trying to get too much attention, or that their child might be teased, that's one thing. To say that anyone "should be shot" is just so over the top.

May 6, 2008 9:48 AM
 

mistress_scorpio said:

How is it that the least accepting and tolerant among us claim to follow a man who accepted all?

I hope this family stays safe and can raise their child in peace.

May 6, 2008 9:53 AM
 

chyna823 said:

I do hope for the health and safety of this family. When two adults love each other, I don't see anything wrong about bringing a child into the relationship.

However, when I saw them on the Oprah show, I had a question: Why is Thomas legally considered a man now, when he still has all his girly parts? He didn't have gender reassigment surgery--he had his breasts removed and he began taking testosterone. And now that he's not even taking testosterone, he's as biologically female as any woman who's had a mastectomy. I don't really see why he's being called a "man," other than that's how he identifies himself.

May 6, 2008 11:54 AM
 

Margaret said:

I just thought I would put out there that I live in the same area as this couple and from what I have seen/heard things have seriously died down here. I think that the initial shock of the news has worn off and people are back to living their lives. They seem to have a good network of friends, neighbors and colleauges that care for them and did a pretty good job of protecting their privacy when the paparazzi starting showing up. Hopefully it will remain that way after their baby is born so that they can be like any other family with a new baby and revel in the joy and love they are about to experience.

May 6, 2008 1:04 PM
 

Sarah said:

Hi, I just feel the need to jump in: I am female born and identified, but my partner is part of the trans community.  I am the one who is pregnant - so we don't have the same struggles that Thomas's family did - but nevertheless, I have a little insight into that family's situation.

First, in response to chyna823 - most female-to-male transgender folks only have what is called "top" surgery, to remove breasts.  Phalloplasty (the creation of a penis from other skin) is *very* rarely done, mainly because it doesn't work - the penis is not functional.  Some transmen do have a form of bottom surgery that "unhooks" the clitoris, allowing it to appear more like a penis - but even this is uncommon.

Secondly, Thomas is certainly not the first transman to become pregnant.  He's the first to seek this kind of publicity - he is trying to sell his book - but many trans families have made similar choices in the past.

Lastly, as part of the trans community I understand the mixed reaction from "within".  Personally, of course I support Thomas and his family and wish them much love and little adversity from those less accepting.  I do think he was an articulate and gentle spokesperson.  However, the way he has portrayed his situation as unique, with the accompanying "freakshow" reaction - is hard to hear.  I fear more for the safety of all transmen's families now that Thomas has gone public.

May 7, 2008 10:30 AM
 

Treespeed said:

Looking at the comments from the previous post it obviously doesn't take much for some folks to throw the Love thy neighbor philosophy right out the window. I think some people need to go back and READ that book they keep shoving down our throats.

May 7, 2008 2:43 PM

About Hannah Tennant-Moore

Hannah Tennant-Moore is a Brooklyn-based freelance writer whose work has appeared or is forthcoming in The Gay and Lesbian Review Worldwide, The Sun, Tricycle, Turning Wheel (as the winner of the Young Writers Award), Best Buddhist Writing, and elsewhere. Hannah is at work on a book of essays about dating in Generation Y and is seeking a publisher for her children’s book, Josephine’s River.

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage