Babble

a magazine and community for the new urban parent

Strollerderby

Women Not Having It All, Having It All, Had Enough

Posted by Kelly Mills

housewife?Meg Wolitzer has a new novel called "The Ten-Year Nap". It's about moms, mostly moms who left the workforce to stay at home with kids. It sounds good, and she says, "In fiction, stay-at-home moms have often been [subject to] mockery, and I think it's very sexist: the stay-at-home mother whose children are oversubscribed, who has reduced her entire brain to trivial things." We can totally use some better depictions of SAHMs. But I have to speak to the fact that once again, we are gonna get a small wave of "Can women have it all?" headlines and I'm over it.

'Kay, look, I'm going to answer the question of whether women can have it all: It depends. I mean, we aren't having a giant collective female experience here, are we? So some moms have to go back to the workforce whether they want to or not, while others can't wait to get back, and still more choose to be home with the kids full time. I know some SAHMs who partly made their decision based on the fact their jobs were low-paying and tiring (like teaching) and they preferred being at home, not just because they wanna be with the kids. I know moms who found being at home with the kids was so not for them. And I know moms who like their jobs and made choices based on the fact that their careers don't allow for much of a break.

I know moms who went back to their careers after the kids went to school, who work from home, who have part-time jobs, who work two jobs, who care for several kids, who are single, and who are the breadwinner with a partner staying at home. You know, not everyone has a really fulfilling career, mom or not. Not everyone finds parenting fulfilling. And things change over time for people. Whether or not you can "have it all" probably depends on what you want, and where you are, and I bet the answer to that question is different for everyone.

Look, I'm irritated because the "have it all" stick is used to beat women for selfishly wanting things or passively not wanting things. It implies that women want too much; and yet asserting that women can have it all ignores that many women are going to have to make a few trade-offs along the way. Rather than get into that, could we get equal pay and better childcare and a little respect for our individual choices? Thanks ever so much.


Comments

 

Anisa said:

really, really well said! :)

April 28, 2008 6:04 PM
 

Rachael Brownell (Redsy) said:

Well done, Mills... What is "it all" anyway? In my house it means clean sheets AND dinner.

April 28, 2008 6:28 PM
 

froggemom said:

I read The Ten Year Nap.  It's a good read.  I don't think its earth-shaking in any real way.  I have it all if I have a day when no one cries, we eat at least one healthy meal, and maybe I get to read for 15 minutes or more.

April 28, 2008 8:20 PM
 

Kim said:

Great post! Down with whining and moralizing, up with respect for individual choices. Amen to that. And while I'm at it, up with keeping one's eye on what matters most to oneself as an individual. Maybe having it all is having the few things that are most important to you, and not worrying about all the other things that might be nice.

Oh, and a big amen on the accessible childcare thing, too!

April 29, 2008 7:21 AM
 

ceridwen morris said:

couldn't agree more.

April 29, 2008 11:20 AM
 

Manjari said:

I just want to add my thumbs up for this post as well.

April 30, 2008 7:53 AM

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • drool.icio.us

    The top million must-have baby products.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage