Babble

a magazine and community for the new urban parent

Strollerderby

Evolution Bad: Ben Stein’s Intelligent Design

Posted by Cole Gamble
We interrupt your regularly scheduled animosity toward Scientology with this Religious News Break. Did you know there is a conspiracy to squelch the teachings of Intelligent Design from our schools? Once again those fat cats at Big Science are choking us with their “truths” when what our children really clamor for is the rebel yell that is Intelligent Design.  

 

At least, that’s what Ben Stein wants you to think. Stein stars in a new documentary called Expelled which asserts that creationism must be taken seriously by scientists. Among Mr. Stein and the filmmakers’ persuasive points: the theory of evolution paved the way for the holocaust 

 

Bueller? Bueller?

 

Expelled just opened last Friday, so if you want to catch it, you might wanna go soon. I predict it will have a short theatrical life and then enjoy a resurrection of cult-like following on DVD.  

 

Before I jump into my rant let’s get to the questions for you. I realize I might make a lot of assumptions about our reading audience on Babble. Perhaps there are more intelligent design supporters out there than I give credit, so let me ask: do you think there is room for intelligent design in school curriculums? Is there room for it anywhere? Do you think it’s harmful to view it as a credible alternative to evolution? 

 

Still here? Okay. Here’s MY big question: Why do science and religion have to go head-to-head ever? Pardon the cliché, but they are apples and oranges. In my mind, the two deal in categories of thought completely exclusive from one another. In other words:  

 

Science looks for KNOWING. How do the chemicals in our brains create the sensation of love? How do they create pain?

 

Religion looks for MEANING. What does love mean? What does hurting mean?   

 

As I have mentioned before, I believe faith and reason can coexist, we just need to know where they belong. Knowledge belongs in schools, faith belongs in churches. I don’t know why understanding the separation is so hard. I wouldn’t swing a bat in a china shop, nor would I bring an antique vase to a baseball game. Religion is a philosophy. It’s meaningful, but not fact. Biblical fact is not fact. You can’t apply the tenets of any philosophy to answer a scientific matter. That’s why you will never see a mechanic fix a Volkswagen by applying the Socratic Method.   

 

Trying to shoehorn faith into the construct of science is as ill-fitting as, well, trying to pass a camel through the eye of a needle. Intelligent design is a closed system. Where science is always reaching out for answers, intelligent design draws a box around everything we understand and calls everything outside that box “God.” Case closed. Makes it hard to find new cures for diseases when you’ve already determined that is unknowable. Back in the early days of man, when there was no science only religion, the average human lifespan was under 30. If you are reading this and over the age of thirty, science is what got you here. Intelligent design, not so much.  

 

How many minutes does Intelligent Design have left in the public’s attention span? Intelligent design just doesn’t seem like a concept that has legs. (You might argue it’s always been there, but thrusting it as an “empirically” proven theory to sit along side evolution seems like a rather modern and perhaps desperate positioning.)   

 

Finally, it kind of hurts my heart because I had a soft spot for Ben Stein, silly old conservative he is. Yeah he was a speechwriter for Nixon. Yes, he’s responsible for Jimmy Kimmel, and by extension, responsible for The Man Show.  His stint as host of a game show that might have actually been harder than Jeopardy gave me the impression that he is a man who puts intelligence first, not “intelligence.” I met him once and he seemed like a genuinely nice man (not that he shouldn’t be) full of curiosity. We were in a theatre I worked and he grilled me about the history of the theatre and this crazy thing called “improv” that we performed there. He just struck me as someone who valued knowledge and wanted to know more about everything he encountered. Oh well.

Comments

 

UnDesign said:

Evolution has always been in contention with religous faith.  When it was first proposed in the 19th century the majority of all scientists, including Darwin, were devout believers.  What was "Big Science" then initally reacted by zealously try to disprove the new Theory.  This erupted in a series of heated meetings with violent shouting matches.  But instead Evolution proved to be one of the most successful theories in science, probably beyond Darwin's wildest dreams... and now a very large proportion of scientists are atheists, a much higher proportion than in the general population.  

I won't say one caused the other outright.. but Evolution takes away one of the most persuasive arguments of the religious believer "Look around at life on the earth and its complexity and interactions. How could this possibly have come about without an intelligent being to create it?"  Evolution tells you exactly how that could happened without an intelligent creator.  It doesn't explain how life started, but how it evolved from an unthinking RNA based proto-cell to the intelligent complexity of the modern human.

Even if you think this is mitigated by the "fact" that God simply started Evolution off and let it run, Evolution states that the course of life has been dictated by the environment that life has adapted to.  That's not exactly a process directed by our ideas of morality.  If life proceeds on a course directed by enviromental expediency morality is left to be simply a human trait.  Something humans employ as part of how our societies work, something that has no meaning beyond us and our societies.  And for most people that's not good enough.  If the whole universe and all of its processes are not recruited into our moral beliefs, then we feel we are adrift and don't understand our place in order of things.

April 20, 2008 3:36 PM
 

Treespeed said:

Creationism does not belong in any science curriculum.

April 22, 2008 5:57 PM
 

ticktock said:

Visit expelledexposed.com to get the other side of the story on this film.  The whole premise of the film is insulting and inaccurate.

You can read a very thoughtful letter from Richard Dawkins to a Jewish man who saw Expelled and believed the message that Hitler was a Darwinist at richarddawkins.net/article,2488,Open-Letter-to-a-victim-of-Ben-Steins-lying-propaganda,Richard-Dawkins

April 22, 2008 8:02 PM
 

jessica said:

Yes creationism belongs in the classroom. Especially when the govt. run schools are teaching little kids to put a condom on a banana, or are allowing satanists to have their groups alongside faith based groups, etc. If you are going to allow one you have to allow all. Show both sides of the coin, so to speak. You can't teach what you want just because you don't believe in the other.

You can't prove that the world is billions of years old, carbon dating is not accurate and you can't prove we evolved from fish or monkeys, so in that aspect we shouldn't be teaching evolution either.

My two dollars worth. And just a side note, you never know what the readers of your blogs believe to be true.

April 23, 2008 1:25 PM
 

Treespeed said:

I would vote that posts like Jessica's prove the point about the state of our country's science education.

April 23, 2008 2:37 PM
 

Steven Melling said:

I saw "Expelled"  and find it to accurate to the subject.

We are no longer free in the science, education community

to follow the evidence. But rather follow the crowd or else.

Science is the love of knowledge that is provable, Faith is the love of knowledge beyond (not in spite) what is provable.  Ideally they should never contradict each other.

Yes, I believe that God (YHWH) through Jesus Christ created all things. That is by faith.  I fear nothing that can be proven scientifically.  But rather invite it.  

April 23, 2008 6:28 PM
 

Kelly said:

Creationism belongs in a comparative world religion course.

Evolution does not explain the beginning of life- nor does any text book I've come across claim to.

Ben Stein, AIG, and the anti-evolution crowd who try to connect evolution to the holocaust are hate mongers who neglect to mention that Hitler was a firm believer in God. The beginning of Mein Kamph states, "I believe everything I have done is in accordance with God's will."

I would be just at wrong in saying that belief in God is to blame for the atrocities committed by Nazi Germany.

Intelligent design may be a concept that doesn't have legs, but for people with faith- legs are unnecessary.

The ID movement is strong in some Midwestern and Southern states.

April 23, 2008 10:20 PM

About Cole Gamble

Cole Gamble is a writer in the environs of Portland, Oregon where he has two children, one he calls “Jillian” and the other he simply refers to as “The Beef.” His revolutionary parenting technique is a three-pronged system consisting of A) wrestling children for fun and profit; B) convincing his daughter she is a robot; and C) resisting the urge to beat up other four-year-olds when they tease his kids. Propagation of aforementioned children was assisted by his wife, Nicole, who is gorgeous but ironically hates being photographed. His writing has appeared in print, on various Internets and been transmitted into the air through the magic of the radio. Currently he is working on an evil self-help book titled Improve Your Life Or Die.

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • drool.icio.us

    The top million must-have baby products.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage