Babble

a magazine and community for the new urban parent

Strollerderby

Science Finally Explains Why the Terrible Two's Are Terrible

Posted by Karen Murphy

toddlersIf kids could skip an entire year and go from one to three, that would be just fine with me. My younger son is in the throes of the Two's about now (even though he's four, just doing things on his own timetable), and it is like living with the Toddler From Hell.  At that point they are all action and will, but little direction. So guess who bears the brunt of their frustration that Life Isn't What They Thought It Would be? That's right, you and me. And this is why:

Two-year-olds act in response to things. They have no idea why they do what they do, they just do it. And then they are confused by the responses they get when they do. Does it do the same thing the 100th time? Let's fine out! But by the age of about 32 months kids begin to think about their behavior in terms of what will come of it. They feel they have some amount of control over their worlds. Ta da! The lightbulb appears, and they magically move from "stimulus-outcome learning" to "fully intentional goal-directed action". 

And then we all breathe that big sigh of relief. The Year of Frustration is over. 

So who will invent the Toddler Cage, designed as a safe enticing sound-proof environment in which to keep your two-year-old until he reaches that magic moment?

Photo: www.bounty.com



Comments

 

PAgent said:

This is precisely why I didn't mind the Terrible Twos, but couldn't cope with the Threes.

When they're two and they throw a fit, it's because the universe doesn't make sense. They're frustrated, they don't understand, and sometimes all you can do is lay down and scream.

But a THREE year old has figured out that by screaming, they get attention. By saying "NO!" they get a reaction, and by touching the thing you told them not to touch, they can make your face turn funny shades of red.

Give me a two-year-old any day. I have a lot more sympathy for them.

February 22, 2008 6:47 PM
 

S said:

I never understood the term Terrible Twos...with us, the worst of it was the F'ing Fours!

February 22, 2008 7:42 PM
 

Mom2Two said:

I'm with the above posters.  Two wasn't bad.  Three has been a nightmare.  

February 22, 2008 11:43 PM
 

catem said:

great.  my twin girls turn two next month and it looks like the recent naptime tantrums are just the beginning.  better get some sleep now...

February 23, 2008 1:09 AM
 

AllisonWonder said:

I have a 2 1/2 year old, and I guess I'm lucky- he has occasional meltdowns and has a whiny time each day, but at least it's understandable (he's tired, or hungry, or overwhelmed...). It's not so bad.

Now I'm going to be worried about him turning 3, though...

February 23, 2008 8:06 AM
 

LogicalMama said:

I fully agree with the first responder. For me, two was great with my son. He definitely challenged me at three. Three and a half specifically. And I fully felt like he took every thing he learned in his two's and applied it at three. Yeah. Definitely in agreement with above.... two was cake....

February 23, 2008 6:21 PM
 

Laughing said:

Terrible two's is a joke as far as Im concerned.

I worked as a lead pre-school teacher in a class of 16 two year olds. Most people would faint at the thought.

Not only was I teaching, changing, and soothing all 16 of the little ones, but I was also trying to manage and train another adult on how to do the same thing.

It was a blast. They were so adorable, hug-able and entertaining that it hardly fazed me when they'd get upset.

I agree with the other posters, 3's and 4's were far more trouble than a giggling bunch of two year olds.

March 13, 2008 2:44 PM

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage