Strollerderby

Guatemala to Suspend Adoptions

Posted by Madeline Holler

After growing unease with his country's adoption process, the president of Guatemala said he will suspend adoptions from his country starting Jan. 1, 2008, leaving 3,000 children already in the process of being adopted in limbo and countless other families mulling adoption to look elsewhere in the world. 

The country's president said he is taking the measure -- seen by some as extreme in that it ignores the fate of what will quickly be thousands of abandoned children -- amid growing concerns about the current system, which opponents say has led to paying mothers for children or coercing them to give up their babies.

An average of 17 children born in Guatemala leave the country for the United States every day with the parents who adopted them. Guatemala has long been considered a place where adoptions are relatively fast and uncomplicated. The Central American country is behind only China in the number of children adopted out to American families every year.

Guatemala has the highest per capita rate of adoption of any country in the world. One of every 100 children born in the country is adopted internationally. American officials say 5,000 adoptions have been approved this year, an all-time high for Guatemalan adoptions to the U.S. American officials also say that last year's 4,000 adoptions were legal and untainted by any problems.

Hotels, lawyers, social workers and some orphanages and foster families have built up businesses around Guatemalan adoptions, which cost an average of $30,000 to process and include at least two trips to the country before bringing baby to a new home permanently.

Adoption has been hotly contested for years there, too, with some people claiming the fact that the process is run by lawyers and social workers -- not the government -- leaves it vulnerable to undesirable practices, such as baby selling or stealing.

NPR's recent report on the country's adoptions looks at charges against a recently raided agency in Guatemala, which was shut down pending charges of exchanging cash for children. The owners, an American and a Guatemalan, deny the charges. 

International adoption has become very visible -- and even more attractive, some might say -- thanks to celebrities like Angelina Jolie, Madonna, Mary-Louise Parker and others Hollywood stars. But it is a subject that is fraught, made even more so whenever accusations of baby-buying surface.

Still, who doesn't know a family who has created a family through international adoption? What do you think? Is Guatemala solving a humanitarian crisis but shutting down adoptions or is it creating one?  


+ DIGG + STUMBLE

Comments

 

joe said:

There are many things in this post that are either incorrect, or just plain wrong. First of all, President Berger made the decision to halt adoptions to Non-Hague Countries only after being told that the U.S. would NOT allow any new adoptions into the U.S. until they are Hague Certified. As a response, or bluff calling, Berger stated that they would be certified Hague compliant on Jan. 1st and further stated that Guatemala wouldn't work with countries that aren't Hague certified (read: The U.S.). As the U.S. wont be certified until April it is a snub to the U.S. for forcing their hand.

Unfortunately, no one is considering the children. Its public knowledge in Guatemala that all the children pulled from that orphanage are presently in Government hands and all are sick with varying illnesses caused by the poor conditions where they are now. This is just the 1st of many steps that will turn Guatemala into the extremely poor Russian adoption situation. The process in Guatemala was more secure than that of China/Korea in that, there were a minimum of 4 occasions where the birth mother was contacted to complete paperwork or get DNA done to ensure her decision was made coherently where-as my friends Chinese daughters were dropped off at the door to an orphanage. They know nothing about their mother, where they were born etc...

My only other point is, before casting judgement, travel there and see the children in the poorer areas (where most of the adopted children come from). They literally hang off the side mirrors of the buses at 45 mph barefoot and filthy, so they can get a free ride into town to shine shoes so their families can eat. Understand that the birth mother of my son is illiterate, un-wed and due to being devoutly Catholic, anti-birth control. This combination is what causes the rise in poverty, rise in population of mal-nourished children, and increase in crime. If these children are brought somewhere safe where they can be raised as a child should, in a safe, loving, healthy environment, vs the life they would have without adoption, why not give them a better life.

As a person who both lived there and adopted from there, I can only sit at home with my son on my lap and pray for all the soon to be orphaned children who will be removed from the loving 1-1 or 2-1 life in a foster home to a poorly run orphanage or worse, sent to their birth mothers who cannot afford to or in some cases want to raise them....... its a shame.

October 6, 2007 1:53 AM
 

anonymous said:

As a parent currently stuck in the process of adopting a little boy from Guatemala, I am troubled by the recent events.  UNICEF dangled upwards of 70 million dollars in front of  President Berger to stop adoptions.  He is not doing this for his moral beliefs.  There is no morality in allowing these children to languish in the streets.  There are no provisions set up to house or care for these children.  Mothers gave up their children to allow for a better life than they could provide.  They did this under  the current laws.  To change the laws for those children in-process would violate the birthmothers' rights to choose.

October 6, 2007 12:29 PM
 

Guatemala » Blog Archives » Guatemala to Suspend Adoptions said:

Pingback from  Guatemala  » Blog Archives   » Guatemala to Suspend Adoptions

October 7, 2007 9:09 AM
 

mrs b said:

while i'm all for Guatamala ratifying the Hague Convention and taking childrens rights seriously....

but what happens to those adoptive parents aren't completed by 31st dec 07? on 1st jan 08 do their adoptive babies just go back into orphanages?

this will leave babies without loving parents

and cause heartbreak for the parents who have got so far along the road to adoption, only to have their dreams shattered.

mrs b

http://www.baby-adoption.co.uk

October 9, 2007 2:28 AM
 

Guatemala » Blog Archives » Guatemala to Suspend Adoptions said:

Pingback from  Guatemala  » Blog Archives   » Guatemala to Suspend Adoptions

October 10, 2007 10:39 PM

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage