I don't believe attachment parenting causes children to become weak, dependent little wussies who have to be held by a parent before they can fall asleep in their dorm bed at college. No, I could care less how long anyone co-sleeps or carries junior around in the sling. But you know what I think is occasionally an unfortunate side effect of attachment parenting?
Self-righteousness.
Not all AP folks are judge-y, and in fact, the ones I know are pretty mellow. And there's Ferberizers and whatever-ers who get righteous too. But when I read the interview with Dave Taylor, author of the Attachment Parenting blog, the very first line was "The core philosophy behind AP is that instead of trying to push your
children away and make them independent beings as soon as possible, you
hold them and nurture them instead." And this certainly isn't the first time I've heard stuff along those lines from the Sears camp and co.
Annoyed now. Okay, now as a non-APer, I do not recall pushing my child away in order to make her independent ASAP. I do remember moving her out of our bed at six months so that I could get some sleep. Also did it so that she could fall asleep without me so that I could go out sometimes in the evenings. In other words, it was more about my independence than hers.
I think people who are into AP should feel as free as possible to do AP stuff without getting slammed with judgment. And I'd really like it if some of the zealots of the movement could chill out on the crib trauma rhetoric. Because we all gotta do what works best for our families. Now put that in your sling and snuggle it.