Strollerderby

I am not claiming that the videos make kids smart. I actually don't believe that. I just don't think they make them stupid, unless of course, you use that instead of traditional teaching.

I'm mostly just giving the guy a hard time because he would rather have his kids watch "American Idol".

Yikes.

Twiggle is right on. Personally, I hate Baby Einstein, even though PBS's kids programming keeps my family sane. My beef with Baby Einstein is that it sells itself as a great educational tool, even though research suggests otherwise.

There's nothing wrong with a pacifier, but I think anyone selling one as "Suck for Smarts" should be shut down.

And my own comment illustrates the danger with our sound-byte culture. One could make the same argument about PBS's kids programming that I make about Baby Einstein: that it claims to be educational, when it probably isn't. (I could thus, pretty fairly, be labeled a hypocrite.)

The essence is the same, however: whether your kids are watching PBS or Baby Einstein, as long as you realize that TV, like sweets, should be used as sparingly as possible and contains no nutritional value, then I wouldn't presume to criticize a parent who uses either. I would, however, hold a "Brain Candy" marketeer in contempt.

And, yes, the "worse than American Idol" quote is just silly. But the point is that all TV is equally bad at early developmental stages.

The point Christakis is making about American Idol, is that watching anything with your parents is better than being plopped alone in front of a TV. Here's the quote in context:

"I would rather babies watch 'American Idol' than these videos," Christakis said, explaining that there is at least a chance their parents would watch with them — which does have developmental benefits.

Out of context, he sounds like a lunatic, of course. In context, I think he makes a good point.

The article is in today's LA Times.

I use it as a chance to narrate for the baby - "The train is going in a circle" "The green tree is next to the car" etc etc - any exposure to language/syntax/semantics is good - and he's distracted by the tv and hangs out for more tummy time.

I knew this was going to happen. A recent study reveals that the brains of babies who aren't exposed to large amounts of educational videos (with cheesy classical music), electronic toys with flashing lights and beeping, and a constant array of "enrichment

I don't know, I was raised on a diet of crappy TV and managed to get into Harvard Law School, where I was surrounded by other students raised on diets of crappy TV (some of whom were out-and-out geniuses). I think how smart you are and whether you are able to turn those smarts into something useful depends on a lot more than what TV fare you happen to waste time watching during a misspent youth.

When I heard this story on NPR, they were saying that the fast "refresh rate" of the different scenes kept the children interested and just when their interest was about to wane, the scene would change and they would be hooked again.

The NPR story used this fact to claim that Baby Einstein leads to higher rates of ADD and ADHD.

They also lectured that children should not watch ANY TV before they are two; the only way to accomplish that is by making the parents watch no TV until their kids are two.

Honestly, I'm of the school of thought that everything should be consumed in moderation (including Baby Einstein).

Amen. Everything in moderation. And stop believing everything you read - especially from those who have some money to be made by your buying MORE and MORE of their products. I have one video (yes, the VHS tape) of a Baby Einstein from 1999 and my 3rd child still enjoyed it in 2006.

Does someone really need 35 (yes, that is 35!!!) DVDs in the new baby eistein gift set. TV can be very useful and educational but you can only take that so far -- in the end you DO have to interact with your kids if you expect them to be normal, never mind a genius!

Proof that PBS is educational: this morning, my boy (24 months) pointed at the t.v. when Sesame Street was on, and said, "Y!"

I turned around and there it was, a bright yellow Y on the screen.

I have been reading to him and doing letter puzzles with him since he was tiny, but Sesame Street is teaching him too.

This study is just silly. Reading *anything* is always going to result in a greater vocabulary than watching anything on television. Duh.

Pingback from  The Filth and the Fury

I followed some articles that Dr. Dimitr Christakis did which was the bases of this article.  Unfortunately Dr. Christakis has not refined his method of research and this is a rehash of his claim on how the increase of TV watching is causing an increase occurrence of ADD.  There are so many holes in his article that it is amazing that the public media ran with it to state TV is Bad for Babies!  The recent interview with Today had clearly stated ... moderation (which applies to everything in life) and to watch WITH the baby (not to leave the baby by themselves).

Well the only reason you might want 35 of the videos is that you get bored watching them too.

Eugene is right. You can read the study here - archpedi.ama-assn.org/.../473. The study did not appear in the Journal of Pediatrics but the Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine back in May 2007. And it didn't conclude that watching TV (with or without the parents) affected baby's language development. However, that's the opinion (not backed by research) of Dr. Dimitri A. Christakis, who also believes watching TV causes ADD/ADHD.

This is more a case of lazy journalism and the press's love of hysterical headlines that freak out parents more than anything.

(I posted about this at mamarant.blogs.com/.../the-real-scoop-.html if you'd like links to the interviews, studies, etc.)

While I'm withholding all judgment on the program's effectiveness (having just acquired it, I haven't yet made my 15-month-old a guinea pig), the five-DVD Your Baby Can Read! system carries a slight misnomer, as the program covers not just

Another study has fueled the ongoing debate between the warring factions of parents over the value of so-called enrichment videos on promoting language skills and fostering infant development. On one side of the divide there are the parents who subscribe