Attachment Parenting is becoming pretty mainstream these days - the slings-wearers, the breast feeders, the co-sleepers: they're everywhere! AP is an idea that is so old, it's new again, and most parents today practice AP in some form or another. Thanks in part to mainstream magazines like Mothering, HipMama and good ol' Dr. Sears, it is now fairly common to breast feed on demand, co-sleep, and wear your baby. These are all positive things. But what happens when attachment parenting lets you down?
BadBadIvy, over at Love Shak, Baby recently posted a rarely-heard take on attachment parenting that I feel like I could have written myself. In her post, How the AP Movement Gave My Daughter a Sense of Entitlement, Ivy explores the idea that perhaps anticipating her daughter's every need, and rarely separating from her until the age of 3, may have contributed to her daughter's evolution into a demanding little diva. Ivy is quick to point out that she doesn't blame AP, so much as she wonders how much attachment parenting, combined with her daughter's innate personality and temperament, played a part in her growing into "the exact definition of diva. She expects things to go her way, and
she wants that to happen right now. She also wants to be with me every
second of every day."
BadBadIvy has done her research: her older son is a "traditionally" parented kid: bottle fed, slept in a crib from the get-go. Her youngest was breast fed, but left on his own a little more. Both are easy going, mild-tempered kids. Her middle child, her daughter, her AP baby, is the one who needs more - all the time. Ivy wonders, "Was this a result of attachment parenting or was this predetermined
personality? I think the diva predisposition was there, but I do think
APing her pushed her over the edge of divadom. Children need more
independence than the AP way allows for. Attachment parenting can make
parents slaves to their children.
My personal experience with AP is similar. I nursed on demand and co-slept with both my kids, but was more "attached" to my older daughter, and she to me. She is a highly sensitive person, and has always been high-needs, literally since the day she came home from the hospital. I often wonder if my drive to parent her in the AP fashion arose from her high-needs personality, or if her personality drove me to find alternative ways of caring for her. Would she be more easy going if today, if I had let her operate a little more independently as a baby/toddler? Would she be less easy going if I'd not tended to what I perceived to be her needs as I had? It's like the chicken and the egg. The younger girl was left to cry a little more, roll around on the floor a little longer, passed off to friends and family a little more freely - and she is a mellower, more even-keeled kid for it.
I really sympathize with BadBadIvy here. I believe in attachment parenting - or rather, my take some/leave some version of it - but I wonder: is there such a thing as being too attached for a kid's own good?
What have your experiences with AP been? What would you do differently? What do you love about it?
[Thanks to The Zero Boss for turning us on to Ivy's post]