FameCrawler

Child Star of Slumdog Millionaire is Homeless

Posted by Karl Erikson



10-year-old child star of "Slumdog Millionaire" - Azharuddin Mohammed Ismail - had his home bulldozed today in a Mumbai slum. Azharruddin was sleeping when a policeman woke him up and told him to get out. The boy lives with his family in a shanty town.

"A police officer took a bamboo stick to hit me, and I was frightened," Azhar said.



The authorities said that the family will be given a new home somewhere else.

Oddly, despite $326 million in earnings and 8 Oscars for "Slumdog Millionaire," the two child stars of the film are still living in poverty.

Slum demolitions are rather common in Indian cities, motivated by officials who wish to keep crowds in control.



Azhar's mother says, "They didn't give prior notice. We didn't even get a chance to take out our belongings." Even though she and the family have lived in the shanty town for longer than 15 years, she has no legal claim to the land. "I don't know what I am going to do," she said, glancing at a plastic bag next to her, stuffed with her family's things.

Families living in demolished shanties are often promised relocation into government housing, but more often than not those are empty promises.

The filmmakers of "Slumdog" claim they've done what they can to help the young stars. A trust was set up for the kids' housing, their education, and a little nestegg for when they finish high school.

None of that seems to be helping Azhar, though, who is now homeless.

Source | Photos | Photos


+ DIGG + STUMBLE

Comments

 

Michelle said:

This is horrendous - Danny Boyle MUST do something about this. These kids are tremendous gifts to our world and deserve all that they have earned. Homes is just a start!

HOLLYWOOD - PLEASE TAKE CARE OF THE FAMILIES YOU HAVE EXPLOITED!!

May 14, 2009 5:16 PM
 

Brian said:

The film grossed $326 million and only cost $15.1 Million to make. That is $311 million in profit! Someone please tell me how anyone with half a heart could scoop up these poor kids fly them to LA to make their movie, and then dump them back off in India to continue living in abject poverty? Even a tiny fraction of that profit could have this family living like kings. I can tell you that I never felt comfortable with the way they handled these poor kids from the get go. It seemed very surreal to me that they would scoop these kids up fly them to the good life, then throw them back like discarded waste. Worst yet, scoop them back up again, fly them back to the good life for the awards show, and then return them back to hell on earth! How is this OK on a human level given how much this movie made? Please, someone needs to tell me this right away because for once in my life I am completely and utterly stumped!

May 14, 2009 9:22 PM
 

Michelle said:

My sentiments exactly, Brian. This is a disgrace upon humanity and had I known that this would have occurred I would have never contributed to the earnings of this movie. I realize that we can not save the entire population living in these India shanty towns, but the movie industry just prostituted the poor children. Even a pimps take better care of their "investments." I am appalled.

May 14, 2009 9:50 PM
 

Billy said:

People should be protesting outside the home of Danny Boyle. I will never see one of his films again. I thought this one was horrendous. But I suppose for Danny Boyle it should be enough to have your poverty-stricken life set to an M.I.A. soundtrack.

May 15, 2009 9:29 AM

About Karl Erikson

Karl Erikson is a writer living in central Florida. Divorced smartass father of twin daughters, he has way too much snark and time on his hands.

in

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage