Babble

a magazine and community for the new urban parent

Baby Squared

Only Make-believe

OK, OK. Game over. I confess: my last post about the play-date with Baby Daddy and co. and his subsequent rebuttal, were totally planned by the two of us, purely bogus and meant only for fun. In truth, I think the whole Almond family is delightful, particularly the newest member. We were just goofin'.

 

It wasn't our intent to dupe anyone -- we thought folks would know we were kidding. We just wanted to satirize the whole fawning, "my kid is the center of the universe" nature of parental blogging. And maybe also mock how snarky and downright mean people can be to each other on blogs -- as if basic standards of courtesy and kindness somehow don't apply on the internets. The fact that so many readers thought we were being serious suggests that the situation is even worse than I thought. Are there people out there who are really that horrible to each other in their blogs? Yeesh!

 

If you were offended or unamused or annoyed by our silliness, what can I say: it's hard to resist a little mischief now and then. Especially after the stress of the holidays. Self-indulgent mischief? No doubt. But then, isn't this whole business of baby blogging (All narrative blogging? All memoir, commentary and opinion?) a little bit self-indulgent on some level? We were attempting to make fun of that --- and ourselves, by extension -- too. Gosh, It's so, like, totally meta and post-modern and self-aware of our self-awareness. Blah blah blah. Snore...

 

Anyway, back to the regularly scheduled program: We had a sweet, loud, absurd and chaotic party for Elsa and Clio to celebrate their first birthday last week. We slightly underestimated how many people would actually accept the invitation and more than slightly overestimated the size of our house, so it was a wee bit crowded. But it was also a lot of fun. I now have a new theory, that the ear-shattering baby screaming you endure in the early months of new parenthood actually serves an important purpose: it deafens you slightly, so that a year later, when you start having parties and play dates with multiple babbling / crying / yelling babies and toddlers, it doesn't bother you quite so much.

 

Here's a snap of the grand celebration. Note the bedecked garland o'er the windows -- my Very Martha solution to the fact that if we'd gotten a tree, the babies would have eaten everything on it and/or pulled it over. Note also our friends Steve, Erin, and Josie Almond beneath said garland, eating Oswalda and Clita's birthday cake. (We invited them; they didn't crash. Honest.)

 

 

Happy New Year, dear readers.

 


+ DIGG + DEL.ICIO.US

Comments

 

Lisa G. said:

It was funny.

Some people just don't think. I mean, I can't imagine y'alls editor, or whoever's in charge, would be terribly thrilled about a real inter-blog flame war, let alone let it go on.

January 2, 2008 11:21 PM
 

Matthew Miller said:

The people who just didn't get it and were offended, I expected when reading the original posts. But the bunches of comments joining in thrashing the other blogger in all apparent seriousness kind of disturbed me, 'cause I'm pretty sure not all of those were  just playing along.

January 3, 2008 7:18 AM
 

Roper said:

Matthew, I agree. That did suck.

(You shoulda said hi at Art Beat! Clever, shmever!)

January 3, 2008 9:02 AM
 

Aunt Heidi said:

I was chatting with BabyDaddy at the party and I didn't even know it...I feel so ashamed at not immediately recognizing his level of fame

January 3, 2008 9:10 AM
 

MaryC said:

Hey, I think this makes one of your points even more strongly - BabyDaddy said that they were trying to point up some of the reasons people get nasty at one another online.  One of those has got to be, it's impossible to tell what tone something is in, when it's online - even if you stick in the groaner LOL, someone might not be sure what's serious and what isn't!  

January 3, 2008 12:32 PM
 

kendra! said:

You fockers!

January 3, 2008 12:46 PM
 

Clementine said:

Happy birthday to your sweet babies!  That looks like a rockin' party.  

January 3, 2008 1:10 PM
 

Joel said:

In the spirit of honesty, I honestly don't believe you. I think you were pissed off, wrote a nasty blog, and then he wrote a nasty response. Reading the posts over, you can see the point: not humor, malice. This never elevated to satire; it was child-protective rhetorical warfare, which happens often, and was realistically -- not satirically -- on display here. Then you try to patch it all up with this lying post. Whatever. You'll have to deal with each other -- or not-- offline. But it makes for the best kind of blog -- the spontaneous emotional response.

Each of you gets two points for compelling realism, three points for narcissistic transference unto children, and zero points for revisionistic coverup.

And by the way, no one gets famous just from blogs anymore.

January 3, 2008 2:19 PM
 

chyna823 said:

I thought both blog posts were hilarious, and I can't believe that anyone who reads either of you regularly would have thought they were serious. Anyhoo, happy 1st to Clia and Elso!

January 3, 2008 2:32 PM
 

EdgyMama said:

I still think a mud wrestling match is the answer. You and Steve first, then throw in the kidlings!

January 3, 2008 2:52 PM
 

Roper said:

Joel, I'm sorry to disappoint your hunger for drama, but we really were just joking.

Or maybe you're joking, too, and I'm missing it? Whoah! Crazy!!

(PS - has anyone EVER gotten famous from a blog?)

January 3, 2008 3:39 PM
 

winecat said:

Count me as one who read both posts a second time just to make sure.  To me the big give away was the trashing of the kiddies.  It's just not like either of you.

But the responses!  Scary people out there.

January 3, 2008 5:54 PM
 

Bella said:

You are an ass for lying to your blogger's.  I won't read anymore on your life.

January 4, 2008 10:33 AM
 

LogicalMama said:

Just proves that you can't please everyone!!

I think that you guys oughta make Josie, Clio and Elsa Wii-Mii's and let them box it out on the Wii boxing game!

Bella, lighten up-- she wasn't "lying;" the intention was not malicious, it was jestful!

January 4, 2008 2:14 PM
 

Jen said:

What did you really get out of lying?  Both of you?  Gosh, how pathetic that you resorted your blog to making up lies.

January 4, 2008 2:38 PM
 

Jamie said:

You're both hilarious, nice to see people having fun instead of talking about how cute their kid is and how hilarious baby poop is.

January 5, 2008 2:59 AM
 

Dwtintx said:

Wow, I'm so surprised that people actually are calling you liars!  It was a JOKE, people, jeez!  And hilarious at that.

Jane, I think the label you put on this post, "if you have to explain the joke..." was right on.  Happy first to the babies!

January 5, 2008 5:57 PM

Leave a Comment

(required)  
(optional)
(required)  
Add

About Roper

I'm an advertising copywriter, wannabe novelist, mother of twins, musician's wife, bleeding heart and wiseass.

in

About the Blogger

Jane Roper

Jane Roper in Boston

One baby? Piece of cake. Try two. This working mother gives you the inside scoop on the ultimate in extreme parenting: twins.

GROUP BLOGS

  • Strollerderby

    The smartest, funniest, most exhaustive parenting blog in the blogosphere.
  • Droolicious

    Modern design for modern parents.
  • FameCrawler

    Your daily baby celebrity fix.
back to blog homepage